“…If it had been possible to use lung tissue from much larger numbers of subjects, it is more likely that case means based on fewer than four biopsies would have been correlated significantly with case means over the WAi in all transverse sections, adding weight to the argument that two or three biopsies could be sufficiently representative of the WAi generally in such circumstances. However, in biopsy studies of airway inflammation in asthma, the size of case groups representing disease states is typically of the order of 10 subjects [3,4,7,8,11,12,15,16,19], rarely much more [6], and in the case of control subjects, often much less [4, 7-9, 11, 12]. Furthermore, increasing the number of subjects is unlikely to substantially alter r values, so that while four or more biopsies will probably reflect .50% of the variance over the WAi generally, fewer than four biopsies will probably reflect much less.…”