2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2008.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of the gelatin extracted from Channel Catfish (Ictalurus Punctatus) head bones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
2
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
31
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This yield was much higher than those reported by Muyonga et al (2004), for Nile perch bone gelatin (2.4 %) and Liu et al (2009), for Channel catfish head bone gelatin (8.43 %). In addition, Rafieian et al (2011) reported 10.2 % gelatin yield for chicken deboner residue after optimization.…”
Section: Physical Properties Of Extracted Gelatincontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…This yield was much higher than those reported by Muyonga et al (2004), for Nile perch bone gelatin (2.4 %) and Liu et al (2009), for Channel catfish head bone gelatin (8.43 %). In addition, Rafieian et al (2011) reported 10.2 % gelatin yield for chicken deboner residue after optimization.…”
Section: Physical Properties Of Extracted Gelatincontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Gelatin with a higher content of α-chain usually gives a greater of yield compared with β-chain gelatin (da Trindade Alfaro et al 2009). The fish bone gelatin extracted from the channel catfish had a molecular weight higher than 200 kDa, 100 kDa and less than 97 kDa (Liu et al 2009). Lizardfish bones were found to have a higher molecular weight portion at 100-120 kDa, which was demonstrated by sharp bands (Taheri et al 2009).…”
Section: Molecular Weight Distribu On Of Fish Bone Gela Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish skins are usually treated with an alkaline solution to remove non-collagenous materials and pigments (Nagarajan et al, 2013;Anand et al, 2013;Nalinanon et al, 2008;Kittiphattanabawon et al, 2010), while a decalcification step has been reported for the extraction of gelatin from fish bones and scales (Sha et al, 2013;Pati et al, 2010, Muyonga et al, 2004aIkoma et al, 2003;Liu et al, 2009;Wang and Regenstein, 2009;Liu et al, 2012). Decalcification has been carried out by acidulation in the case of mackerel (Scomber scombrus) and blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) bones (Khiari et al, 2013) and is commonly employed in the production of gelatin from the bones of terrestrial animals (Schreiber and Gareis, 2007); whereas fish scale decalcification has been done using compounds such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Pati et al, 2010;Nagai et al, 2004;Ikoma et al, 2003;Wang and Regenstein, 2009;Liu et al, 2012), hydrochloric acid (Sha et al, 2013;Wang and Regenstein, 2009), and citric acid (Wang and Regenstein, 2009).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, total processing time for the production of gelatin from fish bones and scales is much shorter compared to the time required for the production of some mammalian gelatins, especially those deriving from cattle, where the alkaline pretreatment may be applied for up to 20 weeks (Ledward, 1986). Regarding fish heads, Liu et al (2009) reported that a hydrolysis step using an alkaline protease was necessary to obtain the head bones from channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), which were then decalcified using hydrochloric acid. In another study, Arnesen and Gildberg (2006) investigated the extraction of muscle proteins and gelatin from cod (Gadus morhua) heads.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%