Invasion Genetics 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781119072799.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Successful Alien Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
94
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exotics ability to use increased resources early and maintain high levels of biomass regardless of the water treatment drove the priority effects in exotic dominated systems. Our results support the idea that exotics, and especially problematic invaders, have wide niche breadth (van Kleunen et al 2015) which allows them to maintain dominance in a wide variety a d e b c Fig. 2 Means ± standard error across the water variability treatment (A low , B High-wet , and C High-dry ) on a seed mix biomass (g) where seed mix biomass is the total biomass from the seed mix seeded 28 days following the priority species, b total biomass (g) where total biomass is the sum of seed mix biomass and priority species biomass, c priority species biomass (g) (controls had no priority species and were not included), d species richness and e Simpson's diversity calculated as (1/ P p i 2 where p i is relative abundance) with a dashed line indicating lower limit of 1. Letters denote significant differences based on Tukey's tests Plant Ecol (2018) 219:429-439 435 of conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exotics ability to use increased resources early and maintain high levels of biomass regardless of the water treatment drove the priority effects in exotic dominated systems. Our results support the idea that exotics, and especially problematic invaders, have wide niche breadth (van Kleunen et al 2015) which allows them to maintain dominance in a wide variety a d e b c Fig. 2 Means ± standard error across the water variability treatment (A low , B High-wet , and C High-dry ) on a seed mix biomass (g) where seed mix biomass is the total biomass from the seed mix seeded 28 days following the priority species, b total biomass (g) where total biomass is the sum of seed mix biomass and priority species biomass, c priority species biomass (g) (controls had no priority species and were not included), d species richness and e Simpson's diversity calculated as (1/ P p i 2 where p i is relative abundance) with a dashed line indicating lower limit of 1. Letters denote significant differences based on Tukey's tests Plant Ecol (2018) 219:429-439 435 of conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Over time, rainfall variability led to the development of distinct communities as forb diversity increased, suggesting that rainfall variability plays a role in community assembly. Successful exotics, however, commonly have a wide niche breadth, either due to higher plasticity or generalist life history traits, meaning that increasing environmental variability may have little effect on exotic dominance (van Kleunen et al 2015). This larger niche width may make the strength of priority effects from exotics more resistant to changes in extreme rainfall events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, here we found no differences in survival percentage and aboveground biomass between the invasive and non-invasive introduced species. This suggests that the importance of many traits and other potential drivers for invasion success may be context dependent (Kueffer et al 2013;van Kleunen et al 2015), and that we need more studies that explicitly address this context dependency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful plant invasions depend, at least partly, on interactions between the introduced species and the native resident community (Inderjit and del Moral 1997;Verhoeven et al 2009;Pearse et al 2013;Qin et al 2013;van Kleunen et al 2015). In other words, invasion is determined by characteristics of the introduced species (driving their invasiveness) and by characteristics of the native recipient community (driving its invasibility; Richardson and Pysek 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low numbers of publications testing the other invasion hypotheses may reflect the relatively young age of those hypotheses. The dominance of Inherent Traits stems from many functional trait comparisons of native and non-native plants (van Kleunen et al 2010(van Kleunen et al , 2014. Studies of allelopathy were especially common for particular invasive forest herb species (e.g., A. petiolata, M. micrantha).…”
Section: Biogeographic Patterns In Understory Herbaceous Invasionsmentioning
confidence: 99%