2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-013-2520-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of stable isotope and hydrochemistry of the groundwater around Qinghai Lake, NE Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously reported, δD and δ 18 O values in the samples of the local rainfall, river water and shallow groundwater were approximately distributed along the global meteoric water line (GMWL) (Craig 1961). Consistently, three of four δD-δ 18 O data points of confined groundwater samples accompanying with surface water and shallow groundwater in the alluvial fan (section I, II) were close to the local meteoric water line (LMWL) (Xiao et al 2013;Cui and Li 2014) or GMWL, and were conspicuously heavier than the one (QH8) collected in the central basin (alluvial-lacustrine plain) (section III) ( Figure 1C). The δD-δ 18 O isotope data might indicate that recharge temperature and renewable capacity of groundwater QH10-2, QH10-4 and QH7 were relatively high, and modern water or rainfall in the piedmont zone was likely the major recharge source.…”
Section: Isotopic Geochemical Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As previously reported, δD and δ 18 O values in the samples of the local rainfall, river water and shallow groundwater were approximately distributed along the global meteoric water line (GMWL) (Craig 1961). Consistently, three of four δD-δ 18 O data points of confined groundwater samples accompanying with surface water and shallow groundwater in the alluvial fan (section I, II) were close to the local meteoric water line (LMWL) (Xiao et al 2013;Cui and Li 2014) or GMWL, and were conspicuously heavier than the one (QH8) collected in the central basin (alluvial-lacustrine plain) (section III) ( Figure 1C). The δD-δ 18 O isotope data might indicate that recharge temperature and renewable capacity of groundwater QH10-2, QH10-4 and QH7 were relatively high, and modern water or rainfall in the piedmont zone was likely the major recharge source.…”
Section: Isotopic Geochemical Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…(above sea level) [21]. At lower lake water levels, there is no lake outlet, and Hulun Lake is a closed, or endorheic basin, with evaporation providing the main source of water loss.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of hydrochemical tracers and stable isotopes approaches can provide insight into hydrological processes, including apportionment between water sources (including groundwater contribution), and their contribution to lake water balances [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In particular, the increase in the values of stable isotopes in water (δ 2 H and δ 18 O) with the increasing extent of evaporative losses [23] can be incorporated into isotope-mass balance determinations to quantify water balances [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6), the d 18 O of river water fluctuated slightly within the year. The fluctuation of d 18 O of river water was smaller than that of precipitation, especially in the dry season (between November and April), and larger than that of groundwater (Cui and Li, 2014b). These all indicated that the river water came mainly from rain during the wet season (June to September), and from interflow in the soils and groundwater during the dry season (between October and April).…”
Section: Stable Isotope In River Watersmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Ca 2þ and Mg 2þ concentrations accounted for more than 77% of the cations (Table 2), indicating that river water chemistry was mainly controlled by carbonate weathering in the Qinghai Lake Basin (Cui and Li, 2014b). The river water TDS was lower than groundwater TDS and higher than precipitation TDS (the average TDS of groundwater and precipitation were539.05 mg/L and 68.10 mg/L, respectively; Hou et al, 2009;Cui and Li, 2014b) chemical interaction between water and rocks was lower in river water than in groundwater. However, one sample collected from the lower part of the Daotang River (location D1) had a TDS of 1014.11 mg/L (Table 2), with a hydrochemical type of Na 2þ -Cl À (Fig.…”
Section: River Water Hydrochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%