2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2013.03.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of slug flow with inertial effects in a rectangular microchannel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(150 reference statements)
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chaoqun et al (5) 의 경우는 속도가 높게 예측이 되었고, Yue et al (9) 의 경우는 수력직경이 600 ㎛인 경우에 대해 식(11) 의   의 값을 0.8로 두고 적용하여 비교적 잘 예측이 됨을 확인하였다. Chaoqun et al (5) 의 경우 수력직경이 약 400 ㎛로 본 연구에서 사용한 유로보다 작으며, 유 로의 직경이 감소함(Yue et al (9) 과 Fukano and Kariyasaki (12) )에 따라   의 값이 증가하는 경향에 의해 예측 의 오차가 발생한 것으로 사료된다. …”
Section: 기포 속도 모델 적용 결과unclassified
“…Chaoqun et al (5) 의 경우는 속도가 높게 예측이 되었고, Yue et al (9) 의 경우는 수력직경이 600 ㎛인 경우에 대해 식(11) 의   의 값을 0.8로 두고 적용하여 비교적 잘 예측이 됨을 확인하였다. Chaoqun et al (5) 의 경우 수력직경이 약 400 ㎛로 본 연구에서 사용한 유로보다 작으며, 유 로의 직경이 감소함(Yue et al (9) 과 Fukano and Kariyasaki (12) )에 따라   의 값이 증가하는 경향에 의해 예측 의 오차가 발생한 것으로 사료된다. …”
Section: 기포 속도 모델 적용 결과unclassified
“…The experimental data are predicted with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 21.6%, and 85.6% of all predictions fall within an error band of ±30%. The model performance is also benchmarked against the experimental data of Chaoqun et al [13] in Figure 6b, and successfully predicts film thickness with an MAE of 21.8%; 77.8% of all predictions fall within an error band of ±30%. For this comparison, film thicknesses taken at Ca values in excess of 0.01 in the original study have been omitted; beyond this threshold, the higher aspect ratio of the channel showed strong inertial effects leading to liquid pooling in the narrow ends of the channel [13].…”
Section: Interface Characterization and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model performance is also benchmarked against the experimental data of Chaoqun et al [13] in Figure 6b, and successfully predicts film thickness with an MAE of 21.8%; 77.8% of all predictions fall within an error band of ±30%. For this comparison, film thicknesses taken at Ca values in excess of 0.01 in the original study have been omitted; beyond this threshold, the higher aspect ratio of the channel showed strong inertial effects leading to liquid pooling in the narrow ends of the channel [13]. The film thickness measurements from the literature were obtained using an approach that relied on significant simplifying assumptions regarding bubble interface geometry, which may be responsible for the discrepancies in the comparison of the present model and the experimental data of Chaoqun et al [13]; experimental uncertainties were not provided for the data.…”
Section: Interface Characterization and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two-phase hydrodynamic characteristics in microchannels have been found to be different than those in large channels. Recent experimental studies by Ghiaasiaan and Abdel-Khalik (2000), Abdelall et al (2005), Toufik et al (2008), Kawahara et al (2002), Serizawa et al (2002), Chaoqun et al (2013), Kawahara et al (2012), Yao et al (2014) and many others tried to formulate and monitor flow in microchannels. However, there are still discrepancies in the data, mainly due to the difficulties in experimental setup and measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%