2023
DOI: 10.1002/leap.1520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of scholarly journals published in non‐English‐speaking countries: An analysis of Library and Information Science SCOPUS journals

Abstract: Although regional journals publish high‐quality research in diverse languages, research published in non‐English‐speaking countries (NESC) tends to have lower international visibility. By outlining the characteristics of SCOPUS journals published in NESC, this study aimed to inform regional scholarly communities interested in internationalizing their journals. A list of 294 SCOPUS journals in the Library and Information Science (LIS) field was extracted from the SCOPUS database; 39.12% of SCOPUS LIS journals (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 2019). Given the coverage similarities between LIS databases, the 453 actively indexed titles and our access, we believe that LISTA would help us capture a sizeable amount of LIS research. SCOPUS - We selected this article index to search to increase our access to international publications, especially in non-English speaking countries (Yoon et al ., 2023), and literature about teaching in higher-education contexts from a variety of other disciplines. Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) - We selected this nationally funded education database as a highly respected source of education scholarly journal articles and reports since 1966. Beyond including LIS literature, it also helps capture K-12 information literacy related content (Corby, 2009) which may be of interest to academic librarians. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses - Though ERIC and LISTA both contain theses and dissertations, we wanted to ensure inclusion of as many theses as possible for 2022 on the subject of information literacy, and this dedicated database assisted in that goal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 2019). Given the coverage similarities between LIS databases, the 453 actively indexed titles and our access, we believe that LISTA would help us capture a sizeable amount of LIS research. SCOPUS - We selected this article index to search to increase our access to international publications, especially in non-English speaking countries (Yoon et al ., 2023), and literature about teaching in higher-education contexts from a variety of other disciplines. Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) - We selected this nationally funded education database as a highly respected source of education scholarly journal articles and reports since 1966. Beyond including LIS literature, it also helps capture K-12 information literacy related content (Corby, 2009) which may be of interest to academic librarians. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses - Though ERIC and LISTA both contain theses and dissertations, we wanted to ensure inclusion of as many theses as possible for 2022 on the subject of information literacy, and this dedicated database assisted in that goal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) SCOPUS -We selected this article index to search to increase our access to international publications, especially in non-English speaking countries (Yoon et al, 2023), and literature about teaching in higher-education contexts from a variety of other disciplines.…”
Section: Search Criteria and Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsinghua University Library 1998 introduced the practice of subject service. In 2003, the Chinese Academy of Sciences Documentation and Intelligence Center in the field of professional libraries established the subject librarian system [3][4][5]. In September 2008, research libraries such as Shanghai Jiaotong University Library and Zhejiang University Library also started to introduce subject services [6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the measurement of journal internationalization from the perspective of geographically representative scholarship has reached a consensus (Begeny, 2018; Begeny et al, 2018; Dyachenko, 2014; Dymond et al, 2000). Unfortunately, current studies are exploratory and descriptive and rarely construct bibliometric measures for a journal's international orientation (Yoon et al, 2023; Zhang et al, 2021). One exceptional study is Moed et al (2020), who employed two indicators to provide an overview of the internationality orientation of journals within the Scopus database; that is, the percentage of papers (co‐)authored by researchers from the country publishing the largest number of papers in the journal (INO‐P) and the percentage of citations by researchers from the country contributing the largest number of citations to the journal (INO‐C).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%