1973
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Respondents and Nonrespondents to a Questionnaire for Estimating Community Mood1

Abstract: Md. 21740) and K. J. Helsing. Characteristics of respondents and nonrespondents to a questionnaire for estimating community mood. Am J Epidemiol 97: 233-239, 1973.-In a study of community mood in Washington County, Maryland, a representative sample of adult residents was selected for interviews. Among this sample, a total of 649 persons had participated in a previous nonofficial census and for this group, similar information was available both for the 571 who were interviewed and the 78 who refused. Characteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(6 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our measure of household mobility (whether the household moved during the previous year) may be regarded as an indicator of social isolation, with more mobile households being less well integrated and therefore less likely to respond, as was initially hypothesized by Groves and Couper (1998). However, our results show lower refusal rates among movers than non‐movers (even after controlling for the type of accommodation), which is consistent with findings from other studies (Comstock and Helsing, 1973) including the findings in Groves and Couper (1998). A possible explanation for this effect is that a recently relocated household may need to make a greater effort to fit in with its new environment and neighbourhood, leading to a higher degree of social integration.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our measure of household mobility (whether the household moved during the previous year) may be regarded as an indicator of social isolation, with more mobile households being less well integrated and therefore less likely to respond, as was initially hypothesized by Groves and Couper (1998). However, our results show lower refusal rates among movers than non‐movers (even after controlling for the type of accommodation), which is consistent with findings from other studies (Comstock and Helsing, 1973) including the findings in Groves and Couper (1998). A possible explanation for this effect is that a recently relocated household may need to make a greater effort to fit in with its new environment and neighbourhood, leading to a higher degree of social integration.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…found that new participants (previous nonparticipants) were more likely to be male than those we had seen in previous surveys, which is in agreement with findings from other volunteer surveys (10)(11)(12)(13). New participants (previous non-participants) were less likely to carry SP than those that had previously participated in the surveys.…”
Section: Original Researchsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Sampling for the CMHE occurred through a 98% complete household roster from a private county census conducted in 1963 (33). Households were randomly selected from the listing and samples were stratified by geographic location and socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%