2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of raindrop spectra as normalized gamma distribution from a Joss–Waldvogel disdrometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a two-moment scheme with a fixed μ, it was found that the microphysical properties of cloud and precipitation are sensitive to the μ values, since the shape parameter plays an important role in determining sedimentation and microphysical growth rates (Milbrandt and Yau 2005). Variations of μ during precipitation events have been reported in previous studies (e.g., Ulbrich 1983; Ulbrich and Atlas 1998;Testud et al 2001;Zhang et al 2001;Islam et al 2012). Considering that the three parameters of the gamma distribution are not independent of each other, an empirical relationship between N0 and μ (Ulbrich 1983) or between μ and Λ (Zhang et al 2001) has been proposed to retrieve a gamma distribution.…”
Section: Shape-slope Relationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For a two-moment scheme with a fixed μ, it was found that the microphysical properties of cloud and precipitation are sensitive to the μ values, since the shape parameter plays an important role in determining sedimentation and microphysical growth rates (Milbrandt and Yau 2005). Variations of μ during precipitation events have been reported in previous studies (e.g., Ulbrich 1983; Ulbrich and Atlas 1998;Testud et al 2001;Zhang et al 2001;Islam et al 2012). Considering that the three parameters of the gamma distribution are not independent of each other, an empirical relationship between N0 and μ (Ulbrich 1983) or between μ and Λ (Zhang et al 2001) has been proposed to retrieve a gamma distribution.…”
Section: Shape-slope Relationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, different investigations carried out on the A and b coefficients of the necessary relationship Z-R have allowed identifying two schools. The first one showed that the coefficient A is higher in the convective part than in the stratiform part of a same squall line [21] whereas the second one, sustained by authors such as Tokay and Short [20], Atlas et al [14], Narayana et al [25], Maki et al [15] and T. Islam et al [7], indicated that coefficient A is higher in stratiform than in convective rain. In other words, there is no clear trend in all of these studies and the question is still opened.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…They showed the existence of three cases noted C 1 (A c < A s and b c < b s ), C 2 (A c < A s and b c > b s ) and C 3 (A c > A s and b c < b s ) from a given squall line to another (the letters c and s in index indicate respectively the convective or stratiform nature of rainfall). Their results revealed the coexistence of the above mentioned two schools, allowing finding the results from Yuter and Houze [21] through the case C 3 as well as those of Tokay and Short [20] and T. Islam et al [7] through the cases C 1 and C 2 . Therefore, they have considered that the difference between the two schools could be explained by the fact that the microphysical conditions, responsible for the rainfall production, were different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations