2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33643-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of phantom upper limb mobility encourage phantom-mobility-based prosthesis control

Abstract: There is an increasing need to extend the control possibilities of upper limb amputees over their prosthetics, especially given the development of devices with numerous active joints. One way of feeding pattern recognition myoelectric control is to rely on the myoelectric activities of the residual limb associated with phantom limb movements (PLM). This study aimed to describe the types, characteristics, potential influencing factors and trainability of upper limb PLM. Seventy-six below- and above-elbow ampute… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amputated participants were followed-up at the Louis Pierquin Centre of the Regional Institute of Rehabilitation, Nancy, France. Their voluntary mobilization of phantom limb had been explored through a questionnaire and a preliminary evaluation in order to make clear distinctions between residual limb sensations, phantom pain, phantom sensations, and most importantly, between mobility of the residual limb and that of the phantom limb (Touillet et al, 2018 ). Both participants reported a good feeling and control of their phantom hand, including separate whole hand and pinch (thumb and index) opening and closing, wrist rotation and flexion/extension of the phantom elbow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amputated participants were followed-up at the Louis Pierquin Centre of the Regional Institute of Rehabilitation, Nancy, France. Their voluntary mobilization of phantom limb had been explored through a questionnaire and a preliminary evaluation in order to make clear distinctions between residual limb sensations, phantom pain, phantom sensations, and most importantly, between mobility of the residual limb and that of the phantom limb (Touillet et al, 2018 ). Both participants reported a good feeling and control of their phantom hand, including separate whole hand and pinch (thumb and index) opening and closing, wrist rotation and flexion/extension of the phantom elbow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would ideal if similar movements can be performed by prosthetic hands and fingers. An intelligent interface that controls prosthetic hands and fingers can suggest movement by interpreting a muscle's electrical activity via the surface EMG signal [16,17]. Figure 2 shows a myoelectrically controlled hand prosthesis, the generation of signals, and EMG channels [6].…”
Section: Signals and Finger Motor Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows a myoelectrically controlled hand prosthesis, the generation of signals, and EMG channels [6]. The myoelectric activities of the residual limb for the phantom limb movements (PLM) may help for pattern recognition in the context of myoelectrical control [17].…”
Section: Signals and Finger Motor Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority of amputees still perceive the lost limb through a natural phenomenon called “phantom limb” ( 19 21 ). These phantom sensations are often non-painful, manifesting as tingling, warmth, or a simple sense of presence as an intact limb ( 19 , 22 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These phantom sensations are often non-painful, manifesting as tingling, warmth, or a simple sense of presence as an intact limb ( 19 , 22 ). Painful phantom sensations also exist but, contrary to popular belief, are not as common as non-painful sensations and are often occasional and moderate ( 21 ). Non-painful phantom sensations during dynamic and functional activities such as walking have only been little reported in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%