2015
DOI: 10.17795/nmsjournal24795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Perceived Stress and Salivary Levels of Secretory Immunoglobulin A and Cortisol in Japanese Women With Premenstrual Syndrome

Abstract: Background:Several studies have demonstrated the associations between Premenstrual Syndrome and perceived stress, and no studies quantifying stress based on biochemical parameters have been conducted.Objectives:The objective of this study was to examine the changes in biochemical parameters of stress and measured perceived stress during the menstrual cycle of women with premenstrual syndrome.Patients and Methods:A longitudinal observational study was conducted in 2010 in the Kansai region of Japan. Thirteen wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DRSP items are typically classified into three clinically determined subgroups, including impairment of emotional, physical, and behavioral activities: depressive‐related symptoms (depression, hopelessness, worthlessness, guiltiness, troubled or excessive sleeping, and a feeling of being overwhelmed); physical symptoms (breast tenderness, headache, muscle or joint pain), and behavioral symptoms (anger/irritability with people); this study reported that the DRSP scores had moderate to strong correlations with the severity of premenstrual disorders. In addition, a study by Watanabe and Shirakawa indicated that higher DRSP scores were associated with more negative impact and stress among PMS patients . The present results revealed that PMS patients exhibited higher DRSP scores in the late luteal phase, suggesting that PMS patients experience a set of emotional, behavioral and physical changes, psychological susceptibility, and environmental stressors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The DRSP items are typically classified into three clinically determined subgroups, including impairment of emotional, physical, and behavioral activities: depressive‐related symptoms (depression, hopelessness, worthlessness, guiltiness, troubled or excessive sleeping, and a feeling of being overwhelmed); physical symptoms (breast tenderness, headache, muscle or joint pain), and behavioral symptoms (anger/irritability with people); this study reported that the DRSP scores had moderate to strong correlations with the severity of premenstrual disorders. In addition, a study by Watanabe and Shirakawa indicated that higher DRSP scores were associated with more negative impact and stress among PMS patients . The present results revealed that PMS patients exhibited higher DRSP scores in the late luteal phase, suggesting that PMS patients experience a set of emotional, behavioral and physical changes, psychological susceptibility, and environmental stressors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…A range of related stressful conditions, including emotional dysregulation and impaired executive function, have been linked with modifications in the OFC, mPFC, and HIPP. In addition, psychological and physical changes have been associated with PMS, inducing a high level of perceived stress during the menstrual cycle . In the present study, alterations in FC between left HIPP and mPFC, MCC, PCC, PC, and OFC suggest that these regions may constitute an interactive circuit associated with emotional, behavioral, and physical modulations in PMS during the luteal phase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, their morning salivary cortisol levels are still lying within the normal range (5.69 +/-4.58 ng/ml) stated by Brandtstadter et al [27]. Putting in mind that changes in immune function in response to stress, especially IgA are sometimes bi-directional [25], there could be an alternative explanation of the significant difference between researchers and employees regarding level of salivary cortisol. The other explanation favors employees suffering from chronic stress [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Researchers had significantly lower salivary cortisol level and higher values for IgA -despite being non significant-than employees that might suggest the presence of acute stress according to literature [22][23][24][25][26]. Yet, their morning salivary cortisol levels are still lying within the normal range (5.69 +/-4.58 ng/ml) stated by Brandtstadter et al [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%