2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-6226(02)00256-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of live animal allometric measurements associated with body fat in fat-tailed sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Low coefficients of variation (CVs) were observed for body measurements, and have been reported by other researchers (Fourie et al, 2002;Ermias & Rege, 2003;Alfolayan et al, 2006;Salako, 2006). The relatively low CV value estimates of the body measurements in the present study can be explained by the small differences among the animals of the population, greater uniformity of the traits, minor changes in these traits by environmental qualifications, better response to selection and other unknown factors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Low coefficients of variation (CVs) were observed for body measurements, and have been reported by other researchers (Fourie et al, 2002;Ermias & Rege, 2003;Alfolayan et al, 2006;Salako, 2006). The relatively low CV value estimates of the body measurements in the present study can be explained by the small differences among the animals of the population, greater uniformity of the traits, minor changes in these traits by environmental qualifications, better response to selection and other unknown factors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The relatively low CV value estimates suggest small variance among animals, more uniformity of traits, minor changes in traits by environmental qualifications, better response to selection, and other unknown factors (Salako, 2006b). The lower CVs for body measurement traits were also reported by other researchers (Fourie et al, 2002;Ermias & Rege, 2003;Alfolayan et al, 2006;Salako, 2006b). …”
Section: Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…All allometric variables were measured by means of a measuring tape. From these measurements, growth variables such as ADG (Ermias & Rege, 2003), kleiber ratio (KR; Kleiber, 1947), relative growth rate (RGR; Fitzhugh & Taylor, 1971) and BMI (Tanaka, Yamaguchi, Kamomae, & Kaneda, 2003) were calculated. Further, the BCS described method as by Russel, Doney, and Gunn (1969) was used to condition score the goats.…”
Section: Growth and Allometric Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%