Characteristics of latrine promotion participants and non‐participants; inspection of latrines; and perceptions of household latrines in Northern Ghana

Abstract

Summaryobjectives To examine characteristics of household heads in two districts of Northern Ghana who had or had not participated in latrine promotion programmes; to inspect latrines; and to explore perceptions of latrine ownership.methods One hundred and twenty latrine owners and 120 non-owners were randomly selected from all trachoma-endemic villages and interviewed. Structured questionnaires assessed demographics, household data, wealth indicators, and perceptions of latrine ownership. Latrines were inspected.results Latrine owners and non-owners were similar demographically, but owners were more likely to report any education or wealth indicators: any education OR ¼ 2.0, (95% CI 1.2-3.4); large family size OR ¼ 4.6 (2.6-8.2); children in school OR ¼ 3.8 (1.3-10.5); and metal roof OR ¼ 9.1 (2.0-40.0). All 120 latrine owners were participating in promotion programmes; no latrines had been self-built without programme support. Inspection showed 73/120 (60.1%) latrines were completed and used. Of the uncompleted latrines 41/47 (87.2%) were more than a year old. Programme participants (regardless of whether they had a completed latrine) had contributed cash (mean $16.74 S.D.18.09) and 117/120 had provided labour and/or construction materials. The most frequently reported advantages of latrine ownership were convenience, cleanliness and health benefits; reported disadvantages were the need for maintenance and cleaning and bad odour.conclusions Current latrine promotion programmes do not reach all households equally. Joining a latrine programme was expensive and did not guarantee latrine ownership; this may cause people to lose trust in such programmes. Latrines were perceived to be useful, suggesting unmet demand. Reliable and inclusive programmes that provide low cost latrines may receive community support.

Geographical analysis of the role of water supply and sanitation in the risk of helminth infections of children in West Africa

“…In Ghana, improvements in water and sanitation have been delivered since 2001 through the eyelid surgery, antibiotic treatment, facial cleanliness, and environmental change (SAFE) strategy for trachoma control (30, 31). However, these improvements were targeted to trachoma hotspots particularly in northern districts of Ghana and the capital Accra, so the latrine construction and provision of clean water were limited in size and geographical scope (32)(33)(34). Additionally, because comparable individual-level WASH data were not available from SCI surveys, the predicted prevalence of water supply, sanitation, and household floor type in a location was used as an imperfect proxy for the WASH status of children's households.…”

Assessing users’ experience of shared sanitation facilities: A case study of community ablution blocks in Durban, South Africa

“…Recent years have witnessed the launch of several initiatives to alleviate the problem of inadequate water supply and sanitation services, by investing in the transfer of appropriate technologies. However, despite the financial resources and institutional commitment involved, most programmes have failed to deliver the expected benefits (Younger, 2007;Rodgers et al, 2007). Typically, unsuccessful interventions have been characterised by top-down approaches to service delivery with little consideration of recipients' demands or their participation in the planning, construction and implementation process (Breslin, 2004;Burra et al, 2003).…”

Theorizing the Internal Social Sustainability of Sanitation Organizations

“…For example, definitions of improved onsite sanitation systems only measure the construction of new systems and do not require that constructed systems are in use. Unfortunately, global evidence suggests that many constructed systems have extremely high abandonment rates (CSIR 2007;Rodgers et al 2007;WSP 2007) with related public and environmental health impacts.…”