Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research 1999
DOI: 10.1145/299513.299678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of high performing IT personnel

Abstract: placed significant emphasis on characteristics related to working with others, while the accountants viewed top IT personnel as loners.With the increasing decentralization of IT responsibilities and personnel to functional areas, the management of IT project teams changes, with more responsibilities for end-user managers in systems development and technology integration tasks. Results of a pilot study to identify differences in the perceptions of IT professionals versus the end-users with respect to the charac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the identified categories of the characteristics of good IS development team members in our study can be found in the list of traits developed by Walz & Wynekoop (1997). However, the relative importance of the identified categories that are perceived by our research participants is different from the findings in Wynekoop & Walz (1999). Our research participants viewed attitude/motivation, expertise, working/cognitive ability, and interpersonal/communication skills as the most important characteristics, while the IT professionals in their study rated abstract thinking, creativity, interpersonal skills, technical and business knowledge as having the highest importance.…”
Section: Research Findings and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Some of the identified categories of the characteristics of good IS development team members in our study can be found in the list of traits developed by Walz & Wynekoop (1997). However, the relative importance of the identified categories that are perceived by our research participants is different from the findings in Wynekoop & Walz (1999). Our research participants viewed attitude/motivation, expertise, working/cognitive ability, and interpersonal/communication skills as the most important characteristics, while the IT professionals in their study rated abstract thinking, creativity, interpersonal skills, technical and business knowledge as having the highest importance.…”
Section: Research Findings and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Another reason for the difference may be the research participants' experience. The average number of years of working experience in our sample is over 9 years, vs. 4.5 years in the study conducted by Wynekoop & Walz (1999).…”
Section: Research Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations