1977
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(77)90024-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of flat, laminar coal-dust flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods also present some drawbacks: for example, the conditions are very dependent on the burner's characteristics and the experimental set-up must be optimized in order to keep the flame locked at the top of the burner, as reported by Dahoe et al (2002), Horton et al (1977) or Kolbe (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods also present some drawbacks: for example, the conditions are very dependent on the burner's characteristics and the experimental set-up must be optimized in order to keep the flame locked at the top of the burner, as reported by Dahoe et al (2002), Horton et al (1977) or Kolbe (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flame has a maximum flame propagation speed of 13.75 m/s at 14 ms. From 14 to 33 ms, the speed is reduced. The flame propagation speed is much higher than that of single-coal dust flame reported by previous literatures, which was 0.2-0.8 m/s (Horton, Goodson, & Smoot, 1977;Slezak, Fitch, Krier, & Buckius, 1983). It is also much higher than those of other dust flame.…”
Section: Behaviors Of Flame Propagationmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Sometimes acoustic standing waves take place in the tube leading to distortion of the flame front and growth in the rate of combustion (Eckhoff, 1997). Burner techniques (Dahoe et al, 2002;Horton, Goodson, & Smoot, 1977;Kolbe, 2001;Mazurkiewicz & Jarosinski, 1990) also highlight some problems. This method shows a clear dependence of the burning velocity on the burner diameter (Cassel, 1964;Kolbe, 2001).…”
Section: Particle Size Of 15 μMmentioning
confidence: 96%