2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00376-020-0080-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Fengyun-4A Satellite Atmospheric Motion Vectors and Their Impacts on Data Assimilation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geostationary meteorological satellites enable the retrieval of AMVs by employing image‐matching techniques that trace specific clouds on continuous satellite images, compute their displacement, and integrate this with cloud top temperatures and pressures (Velden et al., 2005). In cloudy scenarios, visible and near‐infrared radiation help trace cloud movement vectors (Chen et al., 2020; Otsuka et al., 2018). Conversely, radiances from water vapor‐sensitive bands in clear conditions help track water vapor motion vectors (Ouyed et al., 2023; Velden et al., 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geostationary meteorological satellites enable the retrieval of AMVs by employing image‐matching techniques that trace specific clouds on continuous satellite images, compute their displacement, and integrate this with cloud top temperatures and pressures (Velden et al., 2005). In cloudy scenarios, visible and near‐infrared radiation help trace cloud movement vectors (Chen et al., 2020; Otsuka et al., 2018). Conversely, radiances from water vapor‐sensitive bands in clear conditions help track water vapor motion vectors (Ouyed et al., 2023; Velden et al., 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these instruments also currently lack information about upper‐level winds. Satellite‐derived wind can monitor the movement of clouds and produce atmospheric motion vectors (AMVs) focusing on cloudy areas but lack the wind profile information (Chen et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Lim et al., 2019). Moreover, the Aeolus satellite project has successfully obtained comprehensive wind profiles globally for the first time using the space‐based Doppler wind lidar (Li et al., 2023; Stoffelen et al., 2021; Witschas et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown AMVs from these new satellites have significantly increased observation density, decreased speed bias, and assured better quality when compared to AMVs from previous satellite generations [1][2][3][4]. In addition, various Observing System Experiments (OSEs) show positive impact of these new high-resolution satellite AMVs even in the presence of abundant satellite radiance observations in global and regional weather forecasts [1][2][3][5][6][7] and tropical cyclone and hurricane forecasts [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloudy skies are forecast-sensitive areas because of the large horizontal and vertical gradients in the atmospheric variables, which make the predictions under the cloudy skies very difficult (Errico et al, 2007;Geer, 2019;Geer et al, 2017Geer et al, , 2018Li et al, 2016Li et al, , 2021McNally, 2002). All-sky assimilation is expected to facilitate the forecast as clouds present because (a) mass, wind, and humidity fields can be directly improved under cloudy skies (Geer et al, 2008(Geer et al, , 2017Zhu et al, 2016), (b) observations from clouds and precipitation can provide additional information on mass, wind, and humidity (Bauer et al, 2006;Chen et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020;Sawada et al, 2020), and (c) better hydrometeor initialization can be obtained (Chen et al, 2015(Chen et al, , 2016Jones et al, 2013;Jones & Stensrud, 2015;Wu et al, 2016;Wu & Zupanski, 2017). Therefore, some numerical prediction centers (NWP) have operationalized the all-sky assimilation of satellite observation, such as the European Center for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (Bauer et al, 2010), the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (Zhu et al, 2016), and Met Office (Carminati & Migliorini, 2021), while others are ongoing to develop corresponding all-sky assimilation techniques, such as Japan Meteorological Agency (Okamoto et al, 2019), Météo-France (Duruisseau et al, 2019), and the German Weather Service (Harnisch et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%