2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Early Versus Late Implant Failure: A Retrospective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
118
1
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
118
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of early implant failures of the assessed patient collective with less than 1 % is comparable to other studies conducted in healthy patients [15]. The reduced implant survival for patients with an additional RCT appears not to be caused by a failure to establish osseointegration during the healing phase of the implants, which is associated with early implant failure [16], but seems to be an inability to maintain the established osseointegration. Reasons for this cannot be concluded from this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The number of early implant failures of the assessed patient collective with less than 1 % is comparable to other studies conducted in healthy patients [15]. The reduced implant survival for patients with an additional RCT appears not to be caused by a failure to establish osseointegration during the healing phase of the implants, which is associated with early implant failure [16], but seems to be an inability to maintain the established osseointegration. Reasons for this cannot be concluded from this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…It has been shown that late failures are mainly related to periimplantitis (32%) [12], overloading (46.4%), and implant fractures [13] [Table/ Fig-3]. …”
Section: Discussion Aetiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before implant fracture occurrence, signs of bone loss can be visualized through X-ray examinations. Several studies have attributed peri-implant bone resorption as an essential factor of implant fracture risk, and this resorption can far the fracture line [1,4,5,7,8,13,15].…”
Section: Clinical Manifestationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outros dois estudos com taxas de sobrevida favoráveis às mulheres relacionam esse resultado com o fato de apresentarem melhor higiene e controle periódico mais freqüente do que os homens (Turkyilmaz;Mcglumphy, 2008;Jang et al, 2011). No entanto, a literatura mostra também estudos com maior perda de implantes no gênero feminino e também a associação desse gênero com o aumento do risco de perda de estabilidade primária do implante (Mesa et al, 2008;Manor et al, 2009;Krebs et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified