2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of dissolved organic matter following 20years of peatland restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
62
2
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
62
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the difference in [DOC] dynamics is also reflected in DOM quality inferred from its fluorescence properties, with a greater increase in low molecular weight compounds (component M) and fewer aromatic high molecular 5 weight compounds (component C) in the rewetted location during the dry season compared to the control area. These findings are in agreement with the studies by Höll et al (2009), Hribljan et al (2014 and Strack et al (2015) who observed that wetter sites would result in a pore water with smaller and fewer aromatic dissolved organic molecules (likely sourced from inputs of fresh litter from growing vegetation) than the sites with a lower water table.…”
Section: Doc Concentrations and Control Factorssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the difference in [DOC] dynamics is also reflected in DOM quality inferred from its fluorescence properties, with a greater increase in low molecular weight compounds (component M) and fewer aromatic high molecular 5 weight compounds (component C) in the rewetted location during the dry season compared to the control area. These findings are in agreement with the studies by Höll et al (2009), Hribljan et al (2014 and Strack et al (2015) who observed that wetter sites would result in a pore water with smaller and fewer aromatic dissolved organic molecules (likely sourced from inputs of fresh litter from growing vegetation) than the sites with a lower water table.…”
Section: Doc Concentrations and Control Factorssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Long-term studies have reported decreasing pore water [DOC] more than 10 years after a restoration operation took place (Höll et al, 2009;Wallage et al, 2006), while others observed increasing [DOC] after restoration (Hribljan et al, 2014;30 Strack et al, 2015). Glatzel et al (2003) predicted a decrease in [DOC] with time due to a depletion of easily decomposable organic matter in the peat.…”
Section: Doc Concentrations and Control Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, severe natural droughts followed by natural rewetting could destabilize C stocks causing DOC losses to downstream waters (Fenner and Freeman 2011). In contrast, decreased DOC concentration in soil water perhaps due to increased flushing of DOC from upper peat layers in short term (Wallage et al 2006) and decreased decomposition (Höll et al 2009) decades after restoration have been found. These apparent controversies may partly reflect methodological differences arising from e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they seem to be controversial to some extent. For example, both successes and failures of regaining original water table level (Worrall et al 2007, Klimkowska et al 2010 as well as both intended and unintended effects on water chemistry (Höll et al 2009, Wilson et al 2011a have been reported. Despite the results from some early case studies (Jauhiainen et al 2002, Tarvainen et al 2013, the effects of boreal peatland restoration on surface peat chemistry -another important environmental factor -are not well understood.…”
Section: Degradation and Restoration Of Peatland Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation