SAE Technical Paper Series 1999
DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-3662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Direct Injection Gasoline Spray Wall Impingement at Elevated Temperature Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both the spatial distribution of fuel and air entrainment into the impingement spray have a great influence on combustion characteristics. Sakane et al (1987) clarified that the quantity of ambient gas entrained into spray was enlarged by impingement and that mixing between fuel and ambient gas was promoted. Kawamura and Saito (1993) predicted that the thickness of fuel adhered on the wall decreased with an increase in injection pressure, and that droplet size decreased with a decrease in the nozzle diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, both the spatial distribution of fuel and air entrainment into the impingement spray have a great influence on combustion characteristics. Sakane et al (1987) clarified that the quantity of ambient gas entrained into spray was enlarged by impingement and that mixing between fuel and ambient gas was promoted. Kawamura and Saito (1993) predicted that the thickness of fuel adhered on the wall decreased with an increase in injection pressure, and that droplet size decreased with a decrease in the nozzle diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The Kelvin-Helmholtz and Rayleigh-Taylor (KH-RT) breakup model, the No Time Counter (NTC) collision model, and the renormalization group (RNG) k-e model are used, in conjunction with the RANS solver. The uncertainty in the liquid fractions of the multi-phase jets and the interactions among different spray plumes, as well as and the potential of flash boiling [5,15,[20][21][22][23] make it difficult to simulate the dynamic spray plumes using RANS simulation, although reasonable agreement in spray plume penetration could be achieved. The spray characteristics of the two injectors A and B used in this paper has been well characterized in spray chambers and validated using CFD previously [14,15].…”
Section: In-cylinder Spray/mixing Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mie scattering, back-lighting, and Schlieren visualization have been widely adopted for spray visualization [1,[4][5][6][7][8][20][21][22][23]. Compared to Diesel sprays, the DISI sprays have smaller enclosed cone angle, more volatile fuels, shorter aspect-ratio nozzle holes and consequently more unstable vortices.…”
Section: In-cylinder Spray/mixing Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors found that the extent of wall impingement varies significantly with the injector mounting position and the spray cone angle; however, its effects can be reduced by optimizing the injection timing. Park et al (1999) studied the direct-injection gasoline spray-wall interaction inside a pressurized chamber at both cold and elevated temperature conditions. Two hollow cone highpressure swirl injectors with different cone angles (20°and 60°) were used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%