1985
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1985.53.4.959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of corticomotoneuronal postspike facilitation and reciprocal suppression of EMG activity in the monkey

Abstract: In this study we present further evidence supporting the reciprocal nature of output effects on forearm flexor and extensor muscles from single corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells. Spike-triggered averaging of rectified EMG activity was used to test the output effects of 105 motor cortex cells in two rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) trained to perform alternating wrist movements and power grip. The electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from six forearm flexor and six forearm extensor muscles through pairs of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
2
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
67
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3), where CS activity is defined by a vector of mean firing rates. In the simulations reported here, we modeled connectivity based on cortico-motoneuronal and other last-order pre-motor neurons, which have been well characterized using spike-triggered averaging techniques in primates [13][14][15][16][17]. These connections are primarily focal and excitatory.…”
Section: B Model Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3), where CS activity is defined by a vector of mean firing rates. In the simulations reported here, we modeled connectivity based on cortico-motoneuronal and other last-order pre-motor neurons, which have been well characterized using spike-triggered averaging techniques in primates [13][14][15][16][17]. These connections are primarily focal and excitatory.…”
Section: B Model Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional organization of cortical connections between precentral corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells and motoneurons has been elucidated by intracellular recording of CM excitatory postsynaptic potentials (Jankowska et al 1975;Phillips and Porter 1964;Porter and Lemon 1993), by anatomic tracing of CM terminals (Shinoda et al 1981), and by measuring the postspike effects of CM cells in behaving monkeys (Buys et al 1986;Davidson et al 2007;Fetz and Cheney 1980;Griffin et al 2008;Jackson et al 2003;Kasser and Cheney 1985;Schieber and Rivlis 2005;Smith 1989;Smith and Fetz 2009). These studies indicate that single CM cells typically send divergent excitatory connections to motoneurons of multiple muscles and, in some cases, exert reciprocal inhibitory effects on antagonists of their facilitated target muscles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synaptic connectivity of neurons that project to proximal limb motor neuron pools can be roughly identified by spike-triggered averaging (STA) Fetz 1980, 1985;Fetz and Cheney 1978;Kasser and Cheney 1985;McKiernan et al 1998). However, the variability in STA timing, and the inability to record from all muscles at once, make it very difficult to describe a complete connectivity mapping from STA connectivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%