2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of college cyberbullies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
70
0
17

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
12
70
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Other motives found in Schenk et al (2013), included ''dislike'' and ''hatred'' (both with 38.2%) which may be linked to the motive ''Because I don't like the person's attitudes'' (36.4%) found in our study. Through focus group interviews, Smith et al (2008) presented other motives for cyberbullying.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other motives found in Schenk et al (2013), included ''dislike'' and ''hatred'' (both with 38.2%) which may be linked to the motive ''Because I don't like the person's attitudes'' (36.4%) found in our study. Through focus group interviews, Smith et al (2008) presented other motives for cyberbullying.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In accordance with our findings, Akbulut and Eristi (2011) found that approximately 25% of the aggressors reported similar reasons: ''To get revenge'' and ''Having previously been a cybervictim''. Furthermore, Schenk, Fremouw, and Keelan (2013) found that half of the aggressors reported ''anger'' and 17.6% ''revenge''. Therefore, these actions can be associated with retaliation of victimization from bullying and /or cyberbullying (Akbulut & Eristi, 2011;Slonje & Smith, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those articles which shared study populations were: Schenk et al [28] and Schenk et al [29]; Bauman et al [30] and Romero et al [31]; Alavi et al [32] and Roberts et al [33]; Cénat et al [34] and Hébert et al [35]; Hay and Meldrum [14] and Hay et al [36]; and Messias et al [37], Reed et al [38], and Kindrick et al [39]. Further details of these study populations are available in Supplementary Material 1.…”
Section: Study Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excluding duplicate populations [29,31,32,34,36,38,39], the total number of unique participants was 155,471, with a mean of 6,478 and median of 2,761 individuals per study. Most studies included both female and male participants (often not reported separately).…”
Section: Study Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation