1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0923-2508(99)00132-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Chi distribution on different bacterial genomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
69
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
7
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the overrepresentation and skewing of Chi sequences reflect characteristics of GT-rich sequences that coincide with an underlying bias in codon usage and a bias in transcription polarity (29,70,299,303); however, these characteristics statistically correlate most significantly with replication direction (19,100). This implies that the RecBCD enzyme selected Chi largely from the overrepresented recombinogenic GT-rich sequences, which arise from both codon usage and genome base composition, for use as a regulatory switch and recombination hotspot in recombination-dependent replication (19,100,302,304), rather than there being strong prior selective pressure for the Chi sequence to become overrepresented due to its role in recombinational repair. In other words, the RecBCD enzyme adapted largely to the genome and not vice versa.…”
Section: Crossover Hotspot Instigatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, the overrepresentation and skewing of Chi sequences reflect characteristics of GT-rich sequences that coincide with an underlying bias in codon usage and a bias in transcription polarity (29,70,299,303); however, these characteristics statistically correlate most significantly with replication direction (19,100). This implies that the RecBCD enzyme selected Chi largely from the overrepresented recombinogenic GT-rich sequences, which arise from both codon usage and genome base composition, for use as a regulatory switch and recombination hotspot in recombination-dependent replication (19,100,302,304), rather than there being strong prior selective pressure for the Chi sequence to become overrepresented due to its role in recombinational repair. In other words, the RecBCD enzyme adapted largely to the genome and not vice versa.…”
Section: Crossover Hotspot Instigatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the E. coli genome reveals that Chi is the third most overrepresented octamer: E. coli contains 1,008 Chi sequences (the original sequence of E. coli MG1655 reported 1,009 sequences [38], but the recent database shows only 1,008) (19); Chi sequences are four-to eightfold more frequent than expected by chance and appear on average once every 4.5 kb (38,100,302). Even more significant is their skew: 75% are oriented toward the origin of replication, making Chi the most directionally biased 8-nucleotide sequence in E. coli (100,246). Furthermore, there is a statistically significant association between Chi sequences and GT-rich "islands"; GT-rich DNA is the preferred substrate for RecA homology-dependent pairing (302).…”
Section: Crossover Hotspot Instigatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus doubts remain as to the biological significance of this overrepresentation in E. coli (Bell et al, 1998;Biaudet et al, 1998;Uno et al, 2000). Furthermore, very different chi sequences have been found in Haemophilus influenzae and B. subtilis, where the leading strand bias is much less pronounced (El Karoui et al, 1999). Such an overlapping of signals and biases complicates the understanding of the biological reasons behind most oligonucleotide avoidance or overrepresentation (Burge et al, 1992;Mrázek & Karlin, 1998;Salzberg et al, 1998).…”
Section: Oligonucleotide Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diversity in DSB repair enzymes may be related to genome plasticity: genome rearrangements are common events that may occur via intrachromosomal transposition, gene duplications and inversions, or entry of exogenous DNA. In L. lactis, there is a 4:1 orientation bias of Chi distribution with respect to the direction of DNA replication (exo/hel recognizes Chi in one orientation) (14,21,23,29,47). Inversion of a large DNA segment could considerably reduce the number of Chi sites available to stimulate repair if a replication fork break occurs in that region (36).…”
Section: Rexbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exo/hel-Chi couples show remarkably little conservation from one bacterium to another. Furthermore, Chi sites are not the same in different species, and their genome distribution properties differ for each organism (7,8,10,21,45). This suggests that the Chi features of high frequency and overrepresentation on the genome had to arise independently in each case (7,21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%