2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of carbonized sludge for co-combustion in pulverized coal power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study also refers to a batch-type carbonation experiment, conducted by Park and Jang [4], specific to dried sewage sludge at 300-500 °C for 30 min. Koga et al [8] also reported a sewage sludge carbonization system handling 40-60 kg/h of dewatered sludge at a 500 °C carbonation temperature to produce biocoal.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Sewage Sludge Carbonization Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study also refers to a batch-type carbonation experiment, conducted by Park and Jang [4], specific to dried sewage sludge at 300-500 °C for 30 min. Koga et al [8] also reported a sewage sludge carbonization system handling 40-60 kg/h of dewatered sludge at a 500 °C carbonation temperature to produce biocoal.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Sewage Sludge Carbonization Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this study assumes that the carbonization temperature is 450 °C (compared with 500 °C by Koga et al [8]). This lower temperature may be more efficient and reduce energy use [4]. However, Lundin et al [29] showed that the cost of co-incineration with waste was higher than using it in agricultural applications and incineration or fractionation combined with phosphorus recovery.…”
Section: Comparison Of Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The composition of the organic fraction in biomass doesn't vary much. However, the variation of the moisture and ash content is large [6][7][8]. The most popular way of final sewage sludge management is storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, TG can monitor the sample mass of substance as a function of temperature and/or time, whereas DTG is an approach performed by detecting the rate of mass loss. These two approaches have been used recently in thermal degradation of biomass samples (Eero, 1981;Jakab et al, 1997;Meszaros et al, 2007;Sebestyén et al, 2011;Shafizadeh, 1968;Varhegyi et al, 1988;Villanueva et al, 2011;Wilson et al, 2011), investigations of sewage sludge pyrolysis (Dumpelmann et al, 1991;Magdziarz and Werle, 2014), and combustion (Font et al, 2001;Magdziarz and Wilk, 2013), as well as co-combustion of sewage sludge and other substances (Otero et al, 2002;Park and Jang, 2011;Yu and Li, 2014). Operation parameters of SCPs, such as temperature and atmosphere conditions, were also evaluated using both TG and DTG approaches (Calvo et al, 2013;Manara and Zabaniotou, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%