2022
DOI: 10.20956/hajas.v4i1.19259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Bali Bull (Bos Sondaicus) Sexed Sperms with Freeze Dry Egg White at Different Incubation Time

Abstract: The development of reproductive technology for the separation of spermatozoa with X and Y chromosomes, which is better known as sexing, can be carried out in vitro using various methods, one of which is using freeze dry egg whites. This study aims to determine the quality of semen based on incubation time. This study used four types of treatment, namely P0 = No Incubation, P1 = Incubation 30 minutes, P2 = Incubation 45 minutes, P3 = Incubation 60 minutes with six replications. Parameters observed were the qual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual variations of Bali cattle caused significant differences in the intact acrosome cap values of AD, PT1, and PT2 groups (p < 0.05, Table 3). Before freezing, Bali cattle's average intact acrosome cap was 91.06% (Damayanti et al, 2021), while frozen semen was 64.12 ± 1.21-76.82 ± 1.55% (Prihantoko et al, 2020). The best percentage of intact acrosome cap in the PT1 group was for Individual E, with a value of 74.04%, but it was not different from individual J with a value of 73.89%.…”
Section: Plasma Membrane and Intact Acrosomementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Individual variations of Bali cattle caused significant differences in the intact acrosome cap values of AD, PT1, and PT2 groups (p < 0.05, Table 3). Before freezing, Bali cattle's average intact acrosome cap was 91.06% (Damayanti et al, 2021), while frozen semen was 64.12 ± 1.21-76.82 ± 1.55% (Prihantoko et al, 2020). The best percentage of intact acrosome cap in the PT1 group was for Individual E, with a value of 74.04%, but it was not different from individual J with a value of 73.89%.…”
Section: Plasma Membrane and Intact Acrosomementioning
confidence: 89%