2006
DOI: 10.21236/ada457464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and Sampling Efficiencies of OMNI 3000 Aerosol Samplers

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. SPONSORING I MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited. SUPPLEMENT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Air was sampled with a custommodified Omni 3000 fluid impinger (InnovaPrep LLC, Drexel, MO) modified to minimize tubing and allow full removal of tubing for cleaning and sterilization. Omni particle capture efficiency ranges from 40% for 0.5-m particles to Ͼ90% for Ͼ3-m particles (16). The device was chosen because of its relatively high capture rate of bacterium-sized particles; high rate of air passage (250 to 300 liters/min in this study), to minimize sampling time; and relatively quiet function, to minimize conspicuity during this public sampling campaign.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Air was sampled with a custommodified Omni 3000 fluid impinger (InnovaPrep LLC, Drexel, MO) modified to minimize tubing and allow full removal of tubing for cleaning and sterilization. Omni particle capture efficiency ranges from 40% for 0.5-m particles to Ͼ90% for Ͼ3-m particles (16). The device was chosen because of its relatively high capture rate of bacterium-sized particles; high rate of air passage (250 to 300 liters/min in this study), to minimize sampling time; and relatively quiet function, to minimize conspicuity during this public sampling campaign.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rest of UV radiation, from low to high energy, is categorized as UV-A (320-400 nm), UV-B (280-320 nm), and UV-C (100-280 nm), of which UV-C is considered to be the most germicidal. The UV-C wavelength between 250-270 nm can be effectively absorbed by microbial genetic material, and is the UV wavelength most lethal to microorganisms (Keyser et al, 2008). The germicidal effect of UV-C light on bacteria and viruses is primarily due to the formation of pyrimidine (thymine and cytosine) dimers that inhibit the replication and function of genetic material (Giese and Darby, 2000;Prescott et al, 2005).…”
Section: Environmental Factors Affecting Biological Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtration method would not encounter the problems (evaporation of sampling liquid and overloading) of impingers and impactors; however, long sampling duration by filtration may not benefit in microorganism collection because of the biological decay of microorganisms owing to dehydration (Griffin et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2001). In order to collect detectable amounts of microorganisms and to get representative samples over a longer period, some high-volume and durable samplers that can be continuously operated over hours have been developed and applied, including OMNI-3000 and high-volume impinger (Griffin et al, 2011;Kesavan and Schepers, 2006).…”
Section: Sampling Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the number of collectable biological particles, collection efficiencies (CE) were gathered from independent windtunnel testing conducted by the U.S. government using a range of polystyrene latex beads between 0.5 and 8 microns in diameter [36]. The aerosol collection rate employed by Kesavan et al (2006) was 277 liters per minute, which is sufficiently close to 300 liters per minute. We applied CE from 3 and 0.5 microns beads corresponding to 0.91 and 0.357 for the bacterial and viral calculations, respectively.…”
Section: Particle Collection Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%