2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000155783.46747.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support for >24 hrs*

Abstract: Severity of acute organ failures, poor performance status, cancer status, and older age were the main determinants of mortality. The appropriate use of such easily available clinical characteristics may avoid forgoing intensive care for patients with a chance of survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
81
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
81
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are extremely relevant, as treatment decisions are substantially influenced by the clinical condition of the patient. In ICU cancer patients, poor performance status has been associated with mortality [7,17]. Moreover, poor performance status may prevent the use of optimally aggressive chemo-and radiation therapy regimens and/or decrease the ability to achieve radical surgical resection, thereby diminishing long-term survival.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are extremely relevant, as treatment decisions are substantially influenced by the clinical condition of the patient. In ICU cancer patients, poor performance status has been associated with mortality [7,17]. Moreover, poor performance status may prevent the use of optimally aggressive chemo-and radiation therapy regimens and/or decrease the ability to achieve radical surgical resection, thereby diminishing long-term survival.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a fast response would be expected, chemotherapy in the ICU failed to improve outcomes [10], particularly in SCLC patients with extensive disease [20]. Despite the introduction of new treatment strategies, acute respiratory failure secondary to pulmonary involvement or airway obstruction by the malignancy remains associated with very high mortality rates [10,17,20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hypothesized that the reason for this is that, in cases where accompanying VAP or difficult extubation is predicted, past reports (8) have led to the expectation that improvement is more likely to be achieved with NPPV than IMV; thus NPPV was more frequently applied in the ICU treatment group (10). However, the severity of acute respiratory failure as a complication of hematological malignancy makes it difficult to manage acute respiratory failure with mechanical ventilation via NPPV alone (16). Consequently, almost all of the cases progressed to IMV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high mortality of more than 80% in patients requiring mechanical ventilation (Table 1) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] , increasing to more than 90% to 95% in patients developing multiple organ failure or who require renal replacement therapy during ICU stay 12,[16][17][18] , particularly in the transplant setting [19][20][21] , together with the severe emotional burden endured by these patients and their relatives, and the considerable costs of advanced and prolonged life-supporting therapy 13 resulted in a general reluctance to admit such patients to the ICU 2,6,7 . However, over the past few years, several centres throughout the world have been reporting on increasingly improving survival in critically ill patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] , approaching survival rates reported in general ICU patients 32 . In a case-historical control study 22 , Azoulay et al reported a four-fold lower risk of death in cancer patients who required mechanical ventilation between 1996 and 1998 as compared with 1990-1995.…”
Section: Outcome In Critically Ill Cancer Patients: Evolution Over Thmentioning
confidence: 99%