35
Concept and purpose 36Virtually all water treatment facilities worldwide generate an enormous amount of water treatment 37 residual (WTR) solids for which environmentally-friendly end-use options are continually being 38 sought as opposed to their landfilling. Aluminium-based WTR (Al-WTR) can offer huge benefits 39 particularly for phosphorus (P) removal and biofilm attachment when used as media in engineered 40 wetlands. However, potential environmental risks that may arise from the leaching out of its 41 constituents must be properly evaluated before such reuse can be assured. This paper presents 42 results of an assessment carried out to monitor and examine the leachability and leaching patterns of 43 the constituents of an Al-WTR used as media in laboratory scale engineered wetland systems. 44
Main features, materials and methods
45Al-WTR was used as media in four different configurations of laboratory scale engineered wetland 46 systems treating agricultural wastewater. Selected metal levels were determined in the Al-WTR 47 prior to being used while levels of total and dissolved concentration for the metals were monitored 48 in the influent and effluent samples. The increase or decrease of these metals in the used Al-WTR 49 and their potential for leaching were determined. Leached metal levels in the effluents were 50 compared with relevant environmental quality standards to ascertain if they pose considerable risks. 51
Results
52Aluminium, arsenic, iron, lead, and manganese were leached into the treated effluent, but 53 aluminium exhibited the least leaching potential relative to the initial content in the fresh Al-WTR. 54Levels of P increased from 0.13 mg-P/g (fresh Al-WTR) to 33.9 mg-P/g -40.6 mg-P/g (used Al-55 WTR). Dissolved levels of lead and arsenic (except on one instance) were below the prescribed 56 limits for discharge. However, total and dissolved levels of aluminium were in most cases above the 57 prescribed limits for discharge, especially at the beginning of the experiments. 58
Conclusions, recommendations and perspectives 59Overall, the study indicate that when Al-WTR is beneficially reused for enhanced P removal in 60 engineered wetlands as opposed to landfilling it, the leaching out of aluminium into the treated 61 3 effluent beyond the prescribed limits of 0.2mg/l may be a potential problem. However, since the 62 results obtained indicate that most of the aluminium leached out are associated with solids, a post-63 treatment unit which can further reduce the level of aluminium in the treated effluent by filtering 64 out the solids could serve to mitigate this. Notwithstanding, the use of Al-WTR as a media in 65 engineered wetlands can serve to greatly enhance the removal of P from wastewaters and also serve 66 as support material for biofilm attachment.