1961
DOI: 10.1029/jz066i005p01363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and fine structure of the large cosmic-ray fluctuations in November 1960

Abstract: Measurements obtained at Deep River, Canada, from two large neutron monitors, and at Cambridge, Massachusetts, from a high counting rate meson monitor, during the solar cosmic-ray injections of November 12 and 15, 1960, are reported. In addition, rate-meter pen traces of the neutron increases and a magnetometer trace of H, obtained at Deep River, are reproduced. The solar cosmic-ray increase of November 12 appears to be unique in that while it was in progress a sharp Forbush decrease happened to occur as shown… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even here, however, there were preceding large eruptive flares and minor SEP activity that may have contributed to the major SEP event on 14 July via seed particle creation (e.g., Cliver 2006a) and/or proton trapping (Kallenrode & Cliver 2001). A class 3 flare at E30 on 10 November 1960 may have similarly contributed to the large event on 12 November (Steljes et al 1961). Thus it appears that a series of eruptions from near solar central meridian is the preferred way for the Sun to produce a large F 30 SEP event.…”
Section: à2mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Even here, however, there were preceding large eruptive flares and minor SEP activity that may have contributed to the major SEP event on 14 July via seed particle creation (e.g., Cliver 2006a) and/or proton trapping (Kallenrode & Cliver 2001). A class 3 flare at E30 on 10 November 1960 may have similarly contributed to the large event on 12 November (Steljes et al 1961). Thus it appears that a series of eruptions from near solar central meridian is the preferred way for the Sun to produce a large F 30 SEP event.…”
Section: à2mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The neutron monitor network has observed ∼70 GLE since 1956; however, all but three were one or two orders of magnitude less intense than the GLE of 23 February 1956. The comprehensive ionization chamber and neutron monitor data for the GLE of 23 February 1956 provides an intercalibration between the ionization and neutron monitor records of GLE, and threshold levels were further refined using the data obtained during the GLE in November 1960 [ Steljes et al , 1961].…”
Section: Instrumental Record Of Ground Level Enhancements (Gle)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33,34]. The inverse of the hadron flux attenuation length is plotted in units of percent/mm of Hg-see the ordinate values on the right side of the plot to convert to an attenuation length in units of g/cm^The plot shows attenuation length vs. altitude and vs. geomagnetic rigidity, with both the calculations and the many data points coming together with remarkable consistency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[33,34]. Many studies were undertaken under the auspices of the International Geophysical Year(IGY 1957(IGY -1958 and the International Quiet Sun Year (IQSY 1964) [37-51].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%