Characteristics and fate of orthodontic articles submitted for publication: An exploratory study of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Farjo, Nadia; Turpin, David L.; Coley, R. Yates; Feng, Jianying

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.020

Cited by 16 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the majority of studies of a similar nature completed previously, only one database was searched. The results of our study (55.7% papers going on to be published) are consistent with the results that other studies report, and the studies that we have been able to cite indicate a range from 42% to 75% subsequent publication rate . In addition, the results from these studies showed a similar average duration from rejection to publication, with a range of 13.8 to 22 months.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Whilst a number of this type of study has been performed previously, the vast majority search only a single database such as MEDLINE. Several studies were found to have searched more than one database, but none were observed to make direct comparisons between the results. We decided to search the databases of both PubMed and Google Scholar, as we wanted to identify any discrepancies between the two in our literature population.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An analysis of the fate of 917 manuscripts rejected from Clinical Otolaryngology

Earnshaw

Edwin

Bhat

et al. 2017

Clinical Otolaryngology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

An analysis of the fate of 917 manuscripts rejected from Clinical Otolaryngology

Earnshaw

Edwin

Bhat

et al. 2017

Clinical Otolaryngology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A similar trend can also be observed in orthodontics, as it was shown that articles from the United States and Canada had the greatest success with acceptance by the AJODO and were the least likely to be rejected for grammar or writing problems 25 . The authors hypothesised that articles rejected for English proficiency might be more likely to be published in non‐English journals 25 . No data are available for the orthodontic field in the European context.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 72%

“…Man et al identified strong associations between research funding or English proficiency of a country and publication in highly ranked general medical journals 22 . A similar trend can also be observed in orthodontics, as it was shown that articles from the United States and Canada had the greatest success with acceptance by the AJODO and were the least likely to be rejected for grammar or writing problems 25 . The authors hypothesised that articles rejected for English proficiency might be more likely to be published in non‐English journals 25 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

Relationship between European postgraduate programme accreditation and national research output: The case of the Network of Erasmus‐Based European Orthodontic Postgraduate Programmes (NEBEOP) in orthodontics. A bibliometric study

Rafflenbeul

Dot

Séverac

et al. 2020

Eur J Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims To assess in each European country the correlation between the number of Network of Erasmus‐Based European Orthodontic Postgraduate Programmes (NEBEOP) members and orthodontic research activity. Secondary objectives were to describe and quantify Europe's orthodontic research. Materials and methods Articles published between 2014 and 2018 in 4 major orthodontic journals (American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, European Journal of Orthodontics, The Angle Orthodontist, Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research) and oral presentation abstracts of five European Orthodontic Society (EOS) congresses were analysed. For each European country, the total number of orthodontic programmes and NEBEOP memberships were collected. Descriptive statistics were performed, and Spearman correlation coefficients and risk ratios were calculated. Results 2039 articles and 261 oral presentation abstracts were included. Correlation coefficients between national number of publications, oral presentations, sum of these, all adjusted for population, and number of NEBEOP members in each country were 0.64, 0.65 and 0.62, respectively. Risk ratios were all above 1 and statistically significant for number of NEBEOP memberships per country, indicating positive associations with national orthodontic research productivity. Europe accounted for 30.5% of publications and 68.6% of oral presentations at EOS congresses during this period. European orthodontic research was not evenly distributed, since 9 countries were responsible for around 80% of the output. Conclusions A positive association was found between number of NEBEOP programmes and national research activity. These results could be an additional argument to support similar pan‐European initiatives and guidelines for postgraduate education, not only in orthodontics but in all other dental specialties.

show abstract

“…6 Study design has a major impact on the quality of evidence provided by any publication. It also influences their citation metrics, 12 rejection rates, 13 and the dissemination of the knowledge. 12 Non-clinical and cross-sectional studies formed a major share of original articles in JIOS.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Type and Study Design of Publications in the Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society and the Changes in Trends Over 2 Decades

Ramteke

Madhan

2021

J Indian Orthod Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The aim of the study was to analyze the type and study design of publications in the Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society (JIOS) and the changes in their trends from 2001 to 2020. Materials and Methods: All the online publications in JIOS were classified as background resource, original articles, and case reports. The original articles were further divided into 7 types based on study design. The annual and overall data were compiled. To evaluate the change in trends, the study period was divided into 2 block years: 2001 to 2010 and 2011 to 2020. The differences in the total number of articles and distribution of articles by type and study design were analyzed using Mann–Whitney and chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests, respectively. Results: Background resource, original articles, and case reports comprised 38.7%, 43.9%, and 17.4% of the total articles (n = 845), respectively. Non-clinical (34.5%) and cross-sectional (32.35%) studies formed the bulk of original articles. There were 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (4.58%) and 5 systematic reviews (1.35%) among the original articles. The total number of publications were higher for years in the second block compared to those in the first (Mdn of 63.5 vs 14.5, P < .001[A]:Author: Please note that as per AMA, the actual value of P should be expressed to two digits, whether or not it is significant. P values cannot be 0 or 1 and should be changed either to <.001 or >.99, respectively.). The differences in the distribution according to type were not statistically significant [ X2(2) = 2.052, P = .35]. A reduction in the share of cohort studies and increase in RCTs were found in the second block (F = 19.174, P = .002). Conclusions: The higher proportion of background resource publications and those with study designs lower in the hierarchy of evidence is a matter of concern. Though slow paced, the increase in the number of RCTs and systematic reviews over the past few years is encouraging[A]:Author: Please provide 4 to 5 keywords specific to this article..

show abstract

Characteristics and fate of orthodontic articles submitted for publication: An exploratory study of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Cited by 16 publications

References 20 publications

An analysis of the fate of 917 manuscripts rejected from Clinical Otolaryngology

An analysis of the fate of 917 manuscripts rejected from Clinical Otolaryngology

Relationship between European postgraduate programme accreditation and national research output: The case of the Network of Erasmus‐Based European Orthodontic Postgraduate Programmes (NEBEOP) in orthodontics. A bibliometric study

Analysis of the Type and Study Design of Publications in the Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society and the Changes in Trends Over 2 Decades

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About