2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and effects of integrated nutrition and stimulation interventions to improve the nutritional status and development of children under 5 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: IntroductionAround 250 million children in low-income and middle-income countries are at risk of not fulfilling their developmental potential. There is a need to update syntheses investigating the effects of combined nutrition and stimulation interventions on children’s growth and development and identify intervention characteristics associated with positive effects.MethodsWe did a systematic review to: (1) understand the effects of integrated nutrition and stimulation interventions versus (i) usual care and (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possibility is that children in the pair study were slightly more disadvantaged with more children being moderately undernourished and the parents being less educated compared with the present study. There is some evidence that interventions benefit disadvantaged children more than less disadvantaged ones ( 26 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility is that children in the pair study were slightly more disadvantaged with more children being moderately undernourished and the parents being less educated compared with the present study. There is some evidence that interventions benefit disadvantaged children more than less disadvantaged ones ( 26 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been repeated calls to engage multiple family members in childcare [5,[40][41][42], the primary focus of ECD interventions remains on the mother. In a recent systematic review of 24 studies of integrated interventions [8], only one study included fathers [43]. Interventions targeting only mothers to improve child development could potentially limit effectiveness and reproduce patriarchal models that confine women to domestic work and childcare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimulation refers to an interaction between young children and their caregivers that provides them with early opportunities to learn, play and communicate [5]. Growing evidence suggests combining nutrition interventions with stimulation can promote ECD [6][7][8] but implementation strategies for doing this vary by context [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent systematic reviews emphasise the benefits of integrated nutrition and caregiving (including responsive caregiving and early learning) interventions for children’s development in early life [ 9 11 ]. Moreover, a global commitment to promote ECD advocates integrating nutrition and caregiving interventions to establish a holistic early childhood care programme to enhance children’s development [ 2 , 3 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%