2019
DOI: 10.1002/erv.2710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and clinical trajectories of patients meeting criteria for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder that are subsequently reclassified as anorexia nervosa

Abstract: ObjectiveTo examine the initial assessment profiles and early treatment trajectories of youth meeting the criteria for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) that were subsequently reclassified as anorexia nervosa (AN).MethodA retrospective cohort study of patients assessed and treated in a tertiary care eating disorders (ED) program was completed.ResultsOf the 77 included patients initially meeting criteria for ARFID, six were reclassified as having AN (7.8%) at a median rate of 71 days after the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stated absence of these does not necessarily rule out AN, as some individuals may deny these concerns in order to protect their eating disorder from discovery and treatment. 2 To further complicate the differentiation of AN versus ARFID in general, Norris et al 3 observed that 12% of ARFID patients in one small study were subsequently diagnosed with AN either due to further symptom development or further elicitation of previously unacknowledged body image preoccupations and fear of gaining weight. This was not the case for this patient; in fact, she displayed no increased distress with weight gain during the refeeding process, thus ruling out AN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stated absence of these does not necessarily rule out AN, as some individuals may deny these concerns in order to protect their eating disorder from discovery and treatment. 2 To further complicate the differentiation of AN versus ARFID in general, Norris et al 3 observed that 12% of ARFID patients in one small study were subsequently diagnosed with AN either due to further symptom development or further elicitation of previously unacknowledged body image preoccupations and fear of gaining weight. This was not the case for this patient; in fact, she displayed no increased distress with weight gain during the refeeding process, thus ruling out AN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study matched male and female participants according to key clinical criteria, including symptom presentation, body image concerns, and age. The decision was made to match on symptom presentation, rather than diagnosis, given some of the challenges in differentiating between anorexia nervosa and avoidant restrictive food intake disorder, and the diagnostic shift that is reported in a portion of adolescents with eating disorders [ 37 ]. The sample size of cisgender males who completed both Time 1 and Time 2 data is similar to the number of males who participated in two large randomized clinical trials [ 22 ], and this paper is the first to report symptom measures and treatment outcome in a sample of trans youths in comparison to cisgender youths with eating disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study matched male and female participants according to key clinical criteria, including symptom presentation, body image concerns, and age. The decision was made to match on symptom presentation, rather than diagnosis, given some of the challenges in differentiating between anorexia nervosa and avoidant restrictive food intake disorder, and the diagnostic shift that is reported in a portion of adolescents with eating disorders (Norris et al, 2020). The sample size of cisgender males who completed both Time 1 and Time 2 data is similar to the number of males who participated in two large randomized clinical trials (Gorrell et al, 2021), and this paper is the first to report symptom measures and treatment outcome in a sample of trans youths in comparison to cisgender youths with eating disorders.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%