2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and application of S1–P1 nucleases in biotechnology and medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Chit62J4 adaptation happened away from the actual catalytic site. Similar shifts of pH optima, realized by the overall protein composition rather than active site changes, were seen also in other enzymatic systems, e.g., in non-specific nucleases [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The Chit62J4 adaptation happened away from the actual catalytic site. Similar shifts of pH optima, realized by the overall protein composition rather than active site changes, were seen also in other enzymatic systems, e.g., in non-specific nucleases [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In contrast, the C‐clamps largely maintained structural integrity after being processed by the trans‐activated LbCas12a (hereon referred to as Cas12a) and P1 nucleases (Figures S4–S8). The structural damages caused by the S1 and mung bean nucleases are consistent with their reported weak activities of dsDNA digestion, and may be exacerbated by the acidic conditions optimal for their performance . We then tested selected nucleases with the 6 and 12 pN versions of the force clamp.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 55%
“…Towards this goal, we searched for ssDNA‐specific nucleases that function under the ionic and thermal conditions necessary for the stability of DNA‐origami structures. We considered known endonucleases from the S1‐P1 family, including P1, S1 and mung bean nucleases, as well as the CRISPR‐Cas12a (Cpf1), which can be activated by its sequence‐specific double‐stranded DNA (dsDNA) target (ssDNA activators are less efficient) for nonspecific ssDNA trans‐cleavage . To evaluate the nucleases’ DNA‐origami post‐processing capabilities, we adapted the “force clamp” structure designed by the Liedl group .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was first isolated from Aspergillus oryzae by Vogt in 1973 [135]. The primary function of S1 nuclease is to degrade ssDNA or RNA, but its activity is not vigorous when double-stranded substances such as dsDNA and double-stranded RNA are used as substrates [135][136][137]. Therefore, the S1 nuclease is often used as a mediator in FNA biosensors to take advantage of the unique single strand degradation characteristics [59,138,139].…”
Section: S1 Nuclease Based Strategies In Enzyme Mediatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%