2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and abundance of large and small instream wood in a Carpathian mixed-forest headwater basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the presence of broadleaf trees implied the dominant supply of individual branches of lower lengths and diameters, and thus, broadleaf forest canopy had a positive effect on LW counts, as suggested by the separated GLM significant at p < 0.1 level (Table 2 and Figure 7h). A similar pattern of wood recruitment was observed in mixed-forest Carpathian headwater catchments, where the representative coniferous species (Norway spruce), with its dominant supply of whole trees, predicted high LW volume, while the broadleaf trees (mainly European beech) often delivered their fragments (i.e., individual branches) to the streams, leading to high LW frequency (Galia, Ruiz-Villanueva, et al, 2018). This also Figure 11.…”
Section: 1029/2019wr025094supporting
confidence: 67%
“…On the other hand, the presence of broadleaf trees implied the dominant supply of individual branches of lower lengths and diameters, and thus, broadleaf forest canopy had a positive effect on LW counts, as suggested by the separated GLM significant at p < 0.1 level (Table 2 and Figure 7h). A similar pattern of wood recruitment was observed in mixed-forest Carpathian headwater catchments, where the representative coniferous species (Norway spruce), with its dominant supply of whole trees, predicted high LW volume, while the broadleaf trees (mainly European beech) often delivered their fragments (i.e., individual branches) to the streams, leading to high LW frequency (Galia, Ruiz-Villanueva, et al, 2018). This also Figure 11.…”
Section: 1029/2019wr025094supporting
confidence: 67%
“…In particular, researchers need to consider density dependence in fish populations and the causes of density dependence, such as food availability, habitat quality, flood refuge, drought refuge, and thermal refuge. Also, far more studies have examined the ecological and geomorphic influences of large wood, but the relationships with small wood (<1 m length and 10 cm diameter) have received far less attention (Ward and Aumen, 1986; Enefalk and Bergman, 2016; Galia et al ., 2018). Addressing other gaps in large wood research, such as attention to dynamics and roles of wood on floodplains, can be complicated by the need for cross‐discipline collaboration, such as between terrestrial and stream ecologists.…”
Section: Knowledge Gaps and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPOM provides an important food source for benthic organisms (Bunte et al ., 2016) and may significantly contribute to the total carbon exported at the catchment scale (Elosegi et al ., 2007; Sutfin et al ., 2016; Turowski et al ., 2016). In addition, the aggregation or presence of CPOM within a LW accumulation decreases its porosity and generates a more heterogeneous flow path and backwater rise due to an increase of friction losses (Schalko et al ., 2018), influencing the sediment dynamics and thereby the stream morphology (Galia et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantifying and understanding CPOM transport are relevant for assessing its morphological role (Galia et al ., 2018; Schalko et al ., 2018), its availability as a resource, potential contribution to energy flow (Fisher and Likens, 1972; Naiman and Sedell, 1979a; Wallace et al ., 1997), and its importance when establishing catchment carbon budgets (Bunte et al ., 2016). Many studies have addressed the export of CPOM in different environments (Fisher and Likens, 1972; Naiman and Sedell, 1979a; Newbern et al ., 1981; Wallace et al ., 1997; Bunte et al ., 2016; Johnson et al ., 2006; Rodríguez and Ospina, 2007; Cordova et al ., 2008; Turowski et al ., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%