2022
DOI: 10.3390/atmos13101556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics Analysis of the Multi-Channel Ground-Based Microwave Radiometer Observations during Various Weather Conditions

Abstract: Ground-based multi-channel microwave radiometers (MWRs) can continuously detect atmospheric profiles in the tropospheric atmosphere. This makes MWR an ideal tool to supplement radiosonde and satellite observations in monitoring the thermodynamic evolution of the atmosphere and improving numerical weather prediction (NWP) through data assimilation. The analysis of product characteristics of MWR is the basis for applying its data to real-time monitoring and assimilation. In this paper, observations from the late… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the height-and time-dependent coefficients trained in the neural network algorithm, the statistical results of temperature and water vapor show that the differences between the MWR and RS observations vary with height and season, which is consistent with results obtained in previous reports [64,65]. Besides the different sensing methods and retrieval algorithms, other factors, such as the two-station distance, balloon drift, and the lake, terrain, and high building near the MWR site, may bring about the discrepancy of air temperature and water vapor between the two sites.…”
Section: Comparison Between Mwr and Rs Observationssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the height-and time-dependent coefficients trained in the neural network algorithm, the statistical results of temperature and water vapor show that the differences between the MWR and RS observations vary with height and season, which is consistent with results obtained in previous reports [64,65]. Besides the different sensing methods and retrieval algorithms, other factors, such as the two-station distance, balloon drift, and the lake, terrain, and high building near the MWR site, may bring about the discrepancy of air temperature and water vapor between the two sites.…”
Section: Comparison Between Mwr and Rs Observationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results are roughly consistent with those in different sites from previous studies where the temperature is generally 0-3 K lower in the MWR data than in the RS data but the humidity is about 0-20% higher [31,32,67]. In addition, differences between the MWR and RS observations vary with height and season, which is similar to the differences recorded in in previous studies [64,65,68]. The discrepancy between the two measurements may be related to the sensing methods, retrieval algorithms, two-site distance, and environment around the MWR site.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Under clear-sky conditions, there are negative deviations at most of the oxygen channels, except for the 54.94 GHz and 56.02 GHz channels, whereas those at the water vapor channels under clear-sky and cloudy conditions are positive. With the exception of individual oxygen channels, most discrepancies under clear-sky conditions are smaller than on cloudy days, mainly because cloud water content, cloud thickness, and cloud height lead to great uncertainty [46][47][48][49][50][51]. Figure 5b,c show that there is a strong correlation between MOTB and STB under two weather conditions, with correlation coefficients nearing unity.…”
Section: Tb Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the temperature measurements from a microwave radiometer HAT-PRO-G5 [39][40][41] manufactured by RPG were used. The radiometer measured the temperature profiles every 5 min by performing a scan with 11 elevation angles.…”
Section: Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%