1985
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.31.1091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristic size for the neutrino

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, even though in the static limit of zero momentum transfer, q 2 → 0, the form-factor F 1 (q 2 , ξ) becomes independent of ξ, its first derivative with respect to q 2 , which corresponds to the classic definition of the NCR, namely r 2 ν = − 6 ∂F 1 (q 2 ,ξ) ∂q 2 | q 2 =0 , continues to depend on it. The problems associated with the definition of the NCR within the SM and beyond have been examined in detail in a series of papers, and various proposals have been put forth on how to bypass them [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. The main idea behind these works has been to exploit judiciously the GFP-independence of the entire physical amplitude, and eventually define a piece of it which is kinematically akin to an electromagnetic form factor, and is in addition endowed with a set of important physical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, even though in the static limit of zero momentum transfer, q 2 → 0, the form-factor F 1 (q 2 , ξ) becomes independent of ξ, its first derivative with respect to q 2 , which corresponds to the classic definition of the NCR, namely r 2 ν = − 6 ∂F 1 (q 2 ,ξ) ∂q 2 | q 2 =0 , continues to depend on it. The problems associated with the definition of the NCR within the SM and beyond have been examined in detail in a series of papers, and various proposals have been put forth on how to bypass them [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. The main idea behind these works has been to exploit judiciously the GFP-independence of the entire physical amplitude, and eventually define a piece of it which is kinematically akin to an electromagnetic form factor, and is in addition endowed with a set of important physical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dirac neutrino has three form factors which are charge, magnetic moment and anapole moment since the electric dipole moment is zero in CP conserving theory [2]. Majorana neutrino has only one form factor which is the anapole moment [3]. In this manner the neutrinos seem to be likely candidates for carrying features of physics beyond the Standard Model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, due only to the Z boson exchange , according to the diagrams depicted in Fig.1, and using the expression for the amplitude given in Eq.2 (3,4), is respectively After long and straightforward calculation, we obtain for the total width of…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remind that only statistical error for the TEX-ONO measurement [6] was taken into account. One can conclude, that from the measurement of the weak mixing angle with 1% precision it is possible to find a strong evidence for the electron neutrino charge radius, which is estimated theoretically to be of the order of 0.4×10 −32 cm 2 [7][8][9].…”
Section: Weak Mixing Angle and Effective Electron Neutrino Charge Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been discussions in the literature on the possibility to define and to calculate a physically observable neutrino charge radius [7][8][9][10]. All relevant references can be found in Ref.…”
Section: Weak Mixing Angle and Effective Electron Neutrino Charge Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%