2004
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.200405533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristic magnetic length-scales in Vitroperm - Combining Kerr microscopy and small-angle neutron scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5]) suggest that the internal magnetic field necessary to saturate these materials is indeed several orders of magnitude smaller than the above estimate for the demagnetizing field, it can be expected that in the SANS experiment the transition between a single domain and a multi-domain structure occurs in an applied-field range of roughly 20-30 mT. In a recent SANS investigation, which also used a sample of non-ellipsoidal shape [5], the estimated value for the volume-averaged magnetometric demagnetizing field was in excellent agreement with the observed onset of domain formation and was independently confirmed by Kerr microscopy [9]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…[5]) suggest that the internal magnetic field necessary to saturate these materials is indeed several orders of magnitude smaller than the above estimate for the demagnetizing field, it can be expected that in the SANS experiment the transition between a single domain and a multi-domain structure occurs in an applied-field range of roughly 20-30 mT. In a recent SANS investigation, which also used a sample of non-ellipsoidal shape [5], the estimated value for the volume-averaged magnetometric demagnetizing field was in excellent agreement with the observed onset of domain formation and was independently confirmed by Kerr microscopy [9]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The terms in Eqs. (15) and (16) which contain the Fourier coefficient M z (q) ∝ ∆M model the influence of the two-phase magnetic microstructure on the magnetic SANS and are not contained in the corresponding expressions for the single-phase case (compare Eqs. (2.15) in Ref.…”
Section: Micromagnetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,44 In the derivation of Eqs. (15) and (16) terms of higher than linear order in M x or M y have been neglected, in-cluding terms such as 27 Besides this small-misalignment approximation, we have introduced two further approximations: (i) The exchange interaction is assumed to be homogeneous, i.e., jumps in A between the two magnetic phases have not been taken into account. Such an approximation is permissable as long as exchange fluctuations are not too large, in particular, for soft magnetic materials.…”
Section: Micromagnetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the average grain size D is less than the exchange length = ( / ) K l AK 1 (where A and K 1 denote the exchange constant and anisotropy energy constant, respectively), the spin system decorates an effective anisotropy which is averaged over many grains. Small angle neutron scattering (SANS) is a suitable technique to study the micromagnetic structure of these materials at the nanometer scale [2][3][4][5][6][7]. However, the interpretation of the scattering curves is not always straightforward due to effects such as sample inhomogeneities resulting from phase separation in the case of Vitroperm, or residual porosity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%