2016
DOI: 10.1112/jlms.12008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristic foliation on non-uniruled smooth divisors on hyperkähler manifolds

Abstract: We prove that the characteristic foliation F on a non-singular divisor D in an irreducible projective hyperkähler manifold X cannot be algebraic, unless the leaves of F are rational curves or X is a surface. More generally, we show that if X is an arbitrary projective manifold carrying a holomorphic symplectic 2-form, and D and F are as above, then F can be algebraic with nonrational leaves only when, up to a finiteétale cover, X is the product of a symplectic projective manifold Y with a symplectic surface an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This answers positively a question raised in [1] for X quasi-projective (instead of quasi-Kähler there). It is quite likely that this more general case can be handled by similar arguments.…”
Section: Isotriviality Criterionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This answers positively a question raised in [1] for X quasi-projective (instead of quasi-Kähler there). It is quite likely that this more general case can be handled by similar arguments.…”
Section: Isotriviality Criterionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The order of the holonomy group along F b , b ∈ B, is also the multiplicity of F b as a scheme-theoretic fibre of f . This fibration is "orbi-smooth" in the sense that all of its scheme-theoretic fibres have smooth reduced support, and B has quotient singularities (see [1] for details). We choose a smooth compactification (X, D) such that D = X − X is a simple normal crossing divisor, in such a way that that this fibration extends to a holomorphic fibration f : X → B with B normal, and such that…”
Section: Regular Algebraic Foliations Compactificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let X be a projective manifold, and let F ⊂ T X be a holomorphic foliation. Given a movable class α ∈ H n−1,n−1 (X, R) on X, the condition: µ α,min (F ) > 0 means that the inequality of intersection numbers: (1) c 1 (Q).α > 0, holds for any non-zero quotient F → Q → 0. Our first main result is:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structure of the text. 1 As pointed out by A. Langer, there is a very serious gap in the proof of Theorem 1.4 of [17]. On page 49, the reference [18] is indeed used in a context which is not covered by [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good evidence for Conjecture 0.4 is provided by the results of Charles and Pacienza [9], which deal with the deformations of S [n] (case i = 1), and the deformations of S [2] , (case i = 2), and Lin [16] who constructs constant cycles Lagrangian subvarieties in hyper-Kähler manifolds admitting a Lagrangian fibration. Another evidence is given by the complete family of hyper-Kähler 8-folds constructed by Lehn-Lehn-Sorger-van Straten in [17] that we will study in Section 4 (see Corollary 4.9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%