1995
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristic features of inhibitory junction potentials evoked by single stimuli in the guinea‐pig isolated taenia caeci.

Abstract: 1. Changes in membrane potential of the guinea‐pig isolated taenia caeci evoked by single stimuli have been investigated using intracellular recording techniques. Nifedipine (10 microM) was used to arrest spontaneous muscle action potentials. Single stimuli elicited complex junction potentials which consisted of both excitatory and inhibitory components. 2. The excitatory component of the compound junction potential was unaffected by hexamethonium (100 microM) but abolished by atropine (1 microM) and omega‐con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IJPs recorded from the rat colon showed two phases: a sharp decrease of the membrane potential (fast component) followed by a sustained hyperpolarization (slow component). This biphasic IJP is similar to those described in other preparations such as mouse colon (Shuttleworth et al, 1997), mouse ileum (Ward et al, 1994), guinea-pig taenia caeci (Bridgewater et al, 1995), guinea-pig ileum (Crist et al, 1992), human colon (Keef et al, 1993) and human jejunum (Stark et al, 1993), whereas a monophasic IJP has been recorded from the pig (Borderies et al, 1997) and dog (Stark et al, 1993) ileum. The presence of two components in the IJP may suggest a cotransmission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IJPs recorded from the rat colon showed two phases: a sharp decrease of the membrane potential (fast component) followed by a sustained hyperpolarization (slow component). This biphasic IJP is similar to those described in other preparations such as mouse colon (Shuttleworth et al, 1997), mouse ileum (Ward et al, 1994), guinea-pig taenia caeci (Bridgewater et al, 1995), guinea-pig ileum (Crist et al, 1992), human colon (Keef et al, 1993) and human jejunum (Stark et al, 1993), whereas a monophasic IJP has been recorded from the pig (Borderies et al, 1997) and dog (Stark et al, 1993) ileum. The presence of two components in the IJP may suggest a cotransmission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, it has become evident that IJPs may often show two phases, a fast and a slow hyperpolarization. Thus, this pro®le has been described for the IJP elicited by EFS of mouse colon (Shuttleworth et al, 1997), mouse ileum (Ward et al, 1994), guinea-pig taenia caeci (Bridgewater et al, 1995), guinea-pig ileum (Crist et al, 1992), human colon (Keef et al, 1993) and human jejunum (Stark et al, 1993). This biphasic shape of the IJP may suggest the release of more than one neurotransmitter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…-conotoxin GVIA also blocks purinergic IJPs (25). EFS-evoked release of ␤-NAD increased as a function of stimulation frequency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, a substantial portion of the ATP released could have been extrajunctional or could have resulted from stimulation of another population of neurons with -conotoxin-insensitive Ca 2ϩ entry pathways at nerve terminals (i.e., intrinsic nerves other than enteric inhibitory neurons or extrinsic nerves). Fast IJPs in gastrointestinal muscles are blocked by -conotoxin (25), and -conotoxin strongly inhibited the release of ␤-NAD (and its metabolites). Thus, it appears that a substantial fraction of the ␤-NAD released came from nerve terminals of enteric inhibitory nerves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular adenosine 5'-triphodifferent regions of the intestine (Costa et al, 1986; Manzini et sphate (ATP) (Burnstock et al, 1970;Burnstock, 1981;, and that different mechanisms regulate the release of Vladimirova & Shuba, 1984;Zagorodnyuk & Shuba, 1986; different NANC inhibitory transmitters (Zagorodnyuk & Crist et al, 1992). Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) (Grider Maggi, 1994;Bridgewater et al, 1995). & Rivier, 1990;Crist et al, 1992) and, more recently, nitric…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%