2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristic equation of a passive solar still

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is observed that the overall productivity does not change significantly for 24 hours time but the productivities day and night at differ significantly as revealed by Figure 6 plotted for a given mass of PCM. The productivity of the solar still without PCM has also been compared see Figure 14 with the data of [4,9]. The observed data show the similar trend, however, the reason for the difference in the productivity may be attributed to the difference in the climatic conditions of two cities of INDIA: Varanasi and NewDelhi.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is observed that the overall productivity does not change significantly for 24 hours time but the productivities day and night at differ significantly as revealed by Figure 6 plotted for a given mass of PCM. The productivity of the solar still without PCM has also been compared see Figure 14 with the data of [4,9]. The observed data show the similar trend, however, the reason for the difference in the productivity may be attributed to the difference in the climatic conditions of two cities of INDIA: Varanasi and NewDelhi.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The double slope solar still did not prove superior to single slope solar still [4,5]. However, single slope solar still with a condenser in the shaded region slopped increases the still efficiency by 45% [6], bla-ck dye injection in basin water enhance the productivity by 29% [7], the maximum of the annual productivity attained when the condensing glass cover inclination is equal to the latitude of the place [8,9] were found that a lower water depth gives better efficiency, they were dependent on instantaneous gain and loss efficiency curves to give a better understanding of the performance of solar stills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1, 2) it has been observed that energy, exergy efficiencies and embodied energy of single slope solar still remain higher in comparison to that of the double slope solar still. Dev and Tiwari [12,13] have found better performances at water depth 0.01 m and an inclination angle 30º for single slope passive solar still. They have also developed the characteristic equation of single and double slope passive solar still and suggested the sum of instantaneous gain and loss efficiencies (η=η i + η iL ) remain lower than maximum efficiency under ideal i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Torchia-Núñez et al [11] have found that for same exergy input a basin, brine and passive solar still have exergy efficiencies of 12.9%, 6%, and 5% respectively. Dev and Tiwari [12,13] developed the characteristic equation for single and double slope passive solar stills. In ideal solar still, the instantaneous loss efficiency is minimum (for zero depth of water mass) as analyzed by Cooper [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been done on it, with variations in parameters like the type of the material used, the inclination angle of glass cover and cooling, absorbing material inside the solar still, composition of feed water and type of basin liner [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%