2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2019.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristic differences between the brain networks of high-level shooting athletes and non-athletes calculated using the phase-locking value algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Mikicin et al (2015) provided a better demonstration of the multiple dimensional measures taken in the SP–NFT, including participant attention response, Kraepelin work curves, and other indicators, and found that SP–NFT can also improve cognitive function ( Mikicin et al, 2015 ). Other studies have reported changes in other aspects such as EEG characteristics during feedback training or resting state, indicating the neuroplasticity of SP–NFT ( Gong et al, 2019 ). The more diverse the data reported, the more helpful it is to fully reveal the relevant mechanisms of SP–NFT.…”
Section: Some Issues In Sp–nft Developmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Mikicin et al (2015) provided a better demonstration of the multiple dimensional measures taken in the SP–NFT, including participant attention response, Kraepelin work curves, and other indicators, and found that SP–NFT can also improve cognitive function ( Mikicin et al, 2015 ). Other studies have reported changes in other aspects such as EEG characteristics during feedback training or resting state, indicating the neuroplasticity of SP–NFT ( Gong et al, 2019 ). The more diverse the data reported, the more helpful it is to fully reveal the relevant mechanisms of SP–NFT.…”
Section: Some Issues In Sp–nft Developmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These varying results may be because the inter-individual differences in motor level led to large differences in the state of the brain nerve when they obtained their best performance, so that the effective SP–NFT for expert shooters is not applicable for amateur shooters ( Hatfield et al, 1984 ; Bertollo et al, 2016 ; Gong et al, 2019 ). As a result, the simulated SP–NFT requires researchers to confirm whether the feedback characteristics match the brain state during the athletes’ best performance before training.…”
Section: Classification Of Sp–nft Based On User Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLVs result in normalized synchronization values ranging from 0 to 1, and thus no further modification is required before applying them to the weighted network analysis. PLV has been known for the fine performance with weighted minimum norm estimation (45) and has been widely used in the network analysis (46)(47)(48).…”
Section: Connectivity and Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research identified neuronal coupling as underlying electrophysiological correlate of neural efficiency and expertise. Network interactions were found to be stronger in expert brains at rest (Gong et al, 2019) and during tasks related to their field of expertise (Bhattacharya and Petsche, 2005). In this view, α-band coupling thus reflects general intelligence and expertise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%