2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterising spectral, spatial and morphometric properties of landslides for semi-automatic detection using object-oriented methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
359
2
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(374 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(48 reference statements)
8
359
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite modern technological advances, and the availability of new satellite products, the visual interpretation of airborne photographs is still the most common method to obtain landslide information though several other sources of information that may be used such as optical remote sensing images and LiDARderived topographic information (Ardizzone et al, 2007;van den Eeckhaut et al, 2007;Haneberg et al, 2009;Razak et al, 2013;Martha et al, 2010;van den Eeckhaut et al, 2012). Images acquired by synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite sensors are also considered as a powerful source of information, mainly for the recognition of slow-moving landslides (Singhroy and Molch, 2004;Zhao et al, 2012).…”
Section: Published By Copernicus Publications On Behalf Of the Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite modern technological advances, and the availability of new satellite products, the visual interpretation of airborne photographs is still the most common method to obtain landslide information though several other sources of information that may be used such as optical remote sensing images and LiDARderived topographic information (Ardizzone et al, 2007;van den Eeckhaut et al, 2007;Haneberg et al, 2009;Razak et al, 2013;Martha et al, 2010;van den Eeckhaut et al, 2012). Images acquired by synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite sensors are also considered as a powerful source of information, mainly for the recognition of slow-moving landslides (Singhroy and Molch, 2004;Zhao et al, 2012).…”
Section: Published By Copernicus Publications On Behalf Of the Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments have taken place in the use of remote sensing techniques and image analysis to evaluate the extension and impact damages of landslides (Fernández et al, 711 2005;Nichol and Wong, 2005;Danneels et al, 2007;Martha et al, 2010). Landslide inventory mapping can also greatly improve from the use of these techniques (Whitworth et al, 2003;Malamud et al, 2004;Kirschbaum et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reliance upon spectral responses can also result in the misclassification of channel bank erosion and fluvial sedimentation, the misidentification of reactivations, and the division of large landslides into multiple fractions. While the increasing availability of VHR imagery directly enhances the accuracy of manual landslide mapping, the results of automated and semiautomated pixel-based methods that have used VHR imagery are susceptible to large spectral variance between pixels, creating intra-class variability, and are more sensitive to coregistration errors (Moine et al, 2009;Martha et al, 2010;Mondini et al, 2011). Object-based image analysis overcomes many of these issues by accounting for additional metrics such as color, texture, shape, and topography , though the selection of useful object metrics is time intensive and varies from case to case.…”
Section: The Best Way To Map Coseismic Landslidesmentioning
confidence: 99%