2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1811.06411
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterising $k$-connected sets in infinite graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, if all components are smaller than κ and their size does not form a cofinal sequence in κ, there are at least κ many components in which case we even find a star of size κ. See also [8,Corollary 8.1] for a strengthening of the above results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Finally, if all components are smaller than κ and their size does not form a cofinal sequence in κ, there are at least κ many components in which case we even find a star of size κ. See also [8,Corollary 8.1] for a strengthening of the above results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Lemma 2.1 has been generalised to higher connectivity [15,21,27], and so has Lemma 2.2 in [16,20,23,24,27]. For an overview we recommend the introduction of [16].…”
Section: The Star-comb Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We wish to remark that the star-comb lemma has been generalised to take the cardinality of U into account, see the work by Diestel and Kühn [11] for the regular case and the work by Gollin and Heuer [16,Corollary 8.1] for the singular case.…”
Section: The Star-comb Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation