2001
DOI: 10.1039/b106069b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of the structure, deuterium quadrupolar tensors, and orientational order of acenaphthene, a rigid, prochiral molecule, from the NMR spectra of samples dissolved in nematic and chiral nematic liquid crystalline solvents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that (i) according to the inversion symmetry properties of the coupling coefficients in eqs (2.6) and (2.10), inverting the chirality of the solvent has no effect on (2) (2) 02 , uu but inverts the sign of () With the numbering used in Figure 2, the enantiotopic deuterium pairs are {D19, D20} and {D21, D22} while the two pairs are related by a twofold rotation about the z axis and therefore the spectra of D19 and D21 are identical and so are those of D20 and D22. The relevant geometrical constants can be evaluated directly from the known geometry of the molecule [14]; these are 20 19 0.166 20 20 19 19 0.782 20 19 0.154…”
Section: Acenaphthenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that (i) according to the inversion symmetry properties of the coupling coefficients in eqs (2.6) and (2.10), inverting the chirality of the solvent has no effect on (2) (2) 02 , uu but inverts the sign of () With the numbering used in Figure 2, the enantiotopic deuterium pairs are {D19, D20} and {D21, D22} while the two pairs are related by a twofold rotation about the z axis and therefore the spectra of D19 and D21 are identical and so are those of D20 and D22. The relevant geometrical constants can be evaluated directly from the known geometry of the molecule [14]; these are 20 19 0.166 20 20 19 19 0.782 20 19 0.154…”
Section: Acenaphthenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When, as usually happens, these data are not available from experiments, quantum-mechanical calculations can be used to provide reliable estimates of both quantities. [17,18,[27][28][29] Theoretical Calculation of the Force Field: The F used in the ensuing calculations was obtained with the density functional theory (DFT) method using the three-parameter Becke-Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) exchange-correlation functional [30,31] and the 6-31G* standard Gaussian basis set. [32] The corresponding geometry was optimized after imposing planarity on the heavy-atom skeleton by constraining all the dihedral angles and the C=O fragment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 in the covariance matrix elements and using the geometry values given in column II of Table 5 for the phenyl ring and that of Table 4 for the acetyl moiety. Repeating the same calculations using the geometry values given in column I and including all the vibrational frequencies, a low RMS (0.33 Hz) was obtained with a too long r C5C8 = 1.586 AE 0.001 and a too small ff C5C8C9 = 110.9 AE 0.58.…”
Section: Structure Of the Heavyatom Skeleton Using The Rotational Isomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even theoretical approaches at a relatively low level of approximation can be considered sufficiently precise for our purposes, since the vibrational corrections are usually smaller than 5 % of the dipolar couplings. [36][37][38] The precision should increase with the level of approximation and basis set used; for this reason, we opted for MP2/6-31G* for 1,3-butadiene, as a reasonable compromise between CPU time and accuracy. Moreover, we found [39] that at least for benzene, more accurate results were obtained if experimental vibrational frequencies, rather than the calculated ones, were used.…”
Section: Vibrational Averagingmentioning
confidence: 99%