1995
DOI: 10.1016/0167-0115(95)00063-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of the processing by human neutral endopeptidase 24.11 of GLP-1(7–36) amide and comparison of the substrate specificity of the enzyme for other glucagon-like peptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
197
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
197
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of the presence of a penultimate Nterminal glycine in exendin-4, compared with an alanine in GLP-1, exendin-4 is not degraded significantly by DPPIV [15]. Exendin-4 is also a poor substrate in vitro for NEP, whereas GLP-1 is rapidly degraded [8]. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that other peptides, which are structurally similar to GLP-1, show differential susceptibility to DPPIV in vitro (GLP-1≈GIP>GLP-2) [5,23], which does not correlate with their N-terminal half-lives in vivo (GLP-1<GIP≈GLP-2) [2,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a result of the presence of a penultimate Nterminal glycine in exendin-4, compared with an alanine in GLP-1, exendin-4 is not degraded significantly by DPPIV [15]. Exendin-4 is also a poor substrate in vitro for NEP, whereas GLP-1 is rapidly degraded [8]. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that other peptides, which are structurally similar to GLP-1, show differential susceptibility to DPPIV in vitro (GLP-1≈GIP>GLP-2) [5,23], which does not correlate with their N-terminal half-lives in vivo (GLP-1<GIP≈GLP-2) [2,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Part of the difference in metabolic stability between these two peptides, which share 53% sequence homology, is the result of their different susceptibility to enzymatic degradation. Thus, GLP-1 is degraded initially by DPPIV and subsequently by other enzymes, including NEP [8,15]. Exendin-4, however, is reported to be more resistant to enzymatic degradation, and indeed, when incubated in the presence of kidney brush border membranes, which are especially rich in a variety of ectopeptidase activities [22], exendin-4 is remarkably stable, with a rate of proteolysis which is several orders of magnitude less than that of GLP-1 [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The GLP-1/Fc fusion protein is expected to have reduced susceptibility to degradation since such degrading enzymes have a preference for smaller peptides. 49 We have not directly measured the binding affinity of GLP-1/IgG1-Fc for the GLP-1 receptor. However, conjugation with an Fc segment and dimerization has increased the avidity of other molecules for their ligand or receptor considerably.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%