1998
DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1998.2037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of Spent Fluid Catalytic Cracking Catalysts by Nuclear Microprobe Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on industrial catalysts are less common; coke in industrial reforming, hydrotreating, or cracking catalysts was studied using solid-state carbon magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance ( 13 C-MAS-NMR), [3,[6][7][8][9][10][11] supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), [3,7] electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), [12] near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS), [11,13] X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), [7,11] X-ray diffraction (XRD), [14] matrix-assisted laser/desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS), [6] temperature-programmed hydrogenation (TPH) and oxidation (TPO), [11,15] Raman spectroscopy, [11,14] UV-vis microspectroscopy, [16] proton-induced X-ray emission (PIXE), and nuclear reaction analysis (NRA). [17] These techniques often rely on coke-containing samples from which the catalyst was leached (e. g., by dissolution in hydrofluoric acid [4] ) and provide either bulk information or 2-D data at a spatial resolution that is too low to study the relation of catalyst structure and composition on the one hand and coke on the other hand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies on industrial catalysts are less common; coke in industrial reforming, hydrotreating, or cracking catalysts was studied using solid-state carbon magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance ( 13 C-MAS-NMR), [3,[6][7][8][9][10][11] supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), [3,7] electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), [12] near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS), [11,13] X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), [7,11] X-ray diffraction (XRD), [14] matrix-assisted laser/desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS), [6] temperature-programmed hydrogenation (TPH) and oxidation (TPO), [11,15] Raman spectroscopy, [11,14] UV-vis microspectroscopy, [16] proton-induced X-ray emission (PIXE), and nuclear reaction analysis (NRA). [17] These techniques often rely on coke-containing samples from which the catalyst was leached (e. g., by dissolution in hydrofluoric acid [4] ) and provide either bulk information or 2-D data at a spatial resolution that is too low to study the relation of catalyst structure and composition on the one hand and coke on the other hand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[54] The only spatially resolved coke study we are aware of that identified carbon deposits in FCC catalysts used NRA line scans across particle cross-sections with a spatial resolution of several micrometers and revealed uniformly distributed carbon. [17] In a more recent study using NMR and EPR, [12] our group determined an approximate location of aromatic and aliphatic carbon deposits in FCC catalyst particles. Aliphatic coke was deposited within the particle, while aromatic coke was found predominantly in the outer part of the particle close to a paramagnetic species, such as iron (Fe 3 + ; d 5 ), nickel (Ni 2 + ; d 8 ) or vanadium (V 4 + ; d 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 It consists of small particles with diameters of approximately 50-100 mm (ref. 23) and is mainly structured with SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 . 20 Oil reneries all around the world demand 300 thousand tons of FCC catalyst annually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%