2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/ab8091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of negative-Udefects in semiconductors

Abstract: This review aims at providing a retrospective, as well as a description of the state-of-the-art and future prospects regarding the theoretical and experimental characterisation of negative-U defects in semiconductors. This is done by complementing the account with a description of the work that resulted in some of the most detailed, and yet more complex defect models in semiconductors. The essential physics underlying the negative-U behaviour is presented, including electronic correlation, electron-phonon coup… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the end the effective U = −0.46 eV. This feature is what distinguishes a negative-U defect [9], thus implying the existence of a (−/+) transition, here calculated at E c − 1.25 ± 0.02 eV.…”
Section: Vsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the end the effective U = −0.46 eV. This feature is what distinguishes a negative-U defect [9], thus implying the existence of a (−/+) transition, here calculated at E c − 1.25 ± 0.02 eV.…”
Section: Vsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…These defects are termed acceptors or donors, whether they become negatively or positively charged, respectively. Consequently, trapping defects have transition energy levels, which follow directly from their charge state occupancy against the Fermi level under equilibrium conditions [9]. Traps with transition levels 0.1 eV away from the band edges can be conveniently monitored by deep-level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) or derived techniques [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies by Vaqueiro‐Contreras et al [ 14 ] and Markevich et al, [ 15 ] it has been reported that the B s O 2 defect that is responsible for the hole emission signal with its maximum at 390 K in the DLTS spectra has negative‐ U properties. [ 54 ] Direct evidence of negative‐ U properties for a defect can be obtained from an analysis of temperature dependence of its occupancy ratio (occupancy function). [ 54 ] The occupancy function for a negative‐ U defect, f U <0 , differs from the Fermi function that describes the charge occupancy of defects with U > 0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3,4 ] The negative‐U behavior (with U being the electron–electron repulsion) occurs when the ( q − 1/ q ) charge state of a defect lies closer to EnormalV than the ( q / q + 1) one. [ 34,35 ] As a consequence, only a ( q − 1/ q + 1) charge state is found in Egap. The MP correction (Figure 1a) does not show VnormalN (+/3+) in the Kohn‐Sham Egap.…”
Section: Validation Of the Methodologymentioning
confidence: 95%