1992
DOI: 10.1039/ft9928800377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of iron/titanium oxide photocatalysts. Part 1.—Structural and magnetic studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding can be explained by considering that the Fe 3+ content in the Fe-TiO 2 samples is below the detection limit or that amorphous iron oxides species are very dispersed onto the surface of TiO 2 particles. Another explanation is that all Fe 3+ ions might substitute Ti 4+ ions and insert into the crystal lattice of TiO 2 (at least only into the very top layers of the crystallites, due to the relatively low temperature of heating at which the diffusion extent of the ions cannot be very significant) because the radius of Fe 3+ (0.69 Å) is similar to that of Ti 4+ (0.745 Å) [22][23][24]. The crystallite size of the catalysts was calculated from the line broadening.…”
Section: Catalyst Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This finding can be explained by considering that the Fe 3+ content in the Fe-TiO 2 samples is below the detection limit or that amorphous iron oxides species are very dispersed onto the surface of TiO 2 particles. Another explanation is that all Fe 3+ ions might substitute Ti 4+ ions and insert into the crystal lattice of TiO 2 (at least only into the very top layers of the crystallites, due to the relatively low temperature of heating at which the diffusion extent of the ions cannot be very significant) because the radius of Fe 3+ (0.69 Å) is similar to that of Ti 4+ (0.745 Å) [22][23][24]. The crystallite size of the catalysts was calculated from the line broadening.…”
Section: Catalyst Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cu-TiO 2 was prepared by TiO 2 impregnation with CuSO 4 aqueous solutions (incipient wetness impregnation method) [25] at 298 K. First TiO 2 was mixed with an aqueous solution of CuSO 4 . The TiO 2 + metal mixture was stirred for 48 h. Later, water was evaporated by heating it at 373 K over 24 h. Finally, the catalysts were calcined at 773 K for 5 h. Metallic precursor concentration was required to obtain 0.5% (w/w) of dopant.…”
Section: Catalyst Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 shows that there is also little anatase-to-rutile transformation, which is consistent with the literature. 19 Only a small amount (<10% based on XRD data) of rutile can be found in the powders produced, even in that produced at 900°C. As shown in Table I, there is little growth after calcination at 600°C for 3 h. The observed…”
Section: (2) Effect Of Calcination On the Microstructure Of Tio 2 Promentioning
confidence: 99%