2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of ice and THF hydrate slurry crystal size distribution by microscopic observation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To represent the variety of crystal sizes [19,35] the powder was sieved. Sieves of 310/560/760/910 lm were used to select three size ranges.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Mixturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To represent the variety of crystal sizes [19,35] the powder was sieved. Sieves of 310/560/760/910 lm were used to select three size ranges.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Mixturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technology involved, studied for over 20 years, is now mature for industrial use [19,20]. Many studies have been conducted on ice slurry flow in tubes [21,22] and in sudden constrictions [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] The microscopic nucleation and formation kinetics of natural gas hydrates in a porous media are of importance to the effective utilization of the huge resources. [6][7][8][9] There are four models for the formation of natural gas hydrates within the pore spaces of hydrate-bearing sediments: floating, supporting, coating, and cementing. 10,11 The occurrence model and the microstructure of natural gas hydrates within the pores directly govern the mechanical behavior of the sediments, incorporating aspects of solid deformation, multiphase flow, and phase transformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As they require only a cold room and refined image analysis, these methods are rapid, inexpensive, sufficiently accurate and easier to use by industrial operators compared with more sophisticated cryo-scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy (Chang and Hartel, 2002b). Optical microscopy, in turn, could be replaced by more inexpensive and simple devices such as CCD microscopes (Delahaye et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%