1995
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910600115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of four merkel cell carcinoma adherent cell lines

Abstract: We have previously described the establishment of a number of cell lines from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), also known as small cell cancer of the skin or neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. These cells, all of which grew as suspension cultures, were found to resemble small cell lung cancer (SCLC) lines types 1, 2 and 3 by their morphology and growth characteristics. We now report 4 more MCC cell lines which resemble the SCLC type 4 cell lines in that they grow as adherent monolayers. These MCC lines would be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These cell culture characteristics reflect differences in gene expression profiles, suggesting that MCC may have multiple different causes (19). We tested one classic (MKL-1) (20, 21) and three variant (UISO, MCC13, MCC26) cell lines (21)(22)(23), and several common laboratory cell lines, for the presence of MCV infection [supporting information (SI) Table S1]. Only the classic cell line MKL-1 harbors MCV infection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cell culture characteristics reflect differences in gene expression profiles, suggesting that MCC may have multiple different causes (19). We tested one classic (MKL-1) (20, 21) and three variant (UISO, MCC13, MCC26) cell lines (21)(22)(23), and several common laboratory cell lines, for the presence of MCV infection [supporting information (SI) Table S1]. Only the classic cell line MKL-1 harbors MCV infection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the small gene-expression level variances between MCC and SCLC, as a result of their similarity, we had to choose a rather low delta (D ¼ 0.33878) in order to include as many genes as possible with significant but sometimes small expression differences in MCC versus SCLC and Classic MCC cell lines express neuroendocrine markers including neuron-specific enolase and Chromogranin A, and contain neurosecretory granules (Leonard et al, 1993). Variant MCC cell lines have a selective loss of neuroendocrine markers including Chromogranin A, and do not contain neurosecretory granules, as evidenced by electron microscopy (Leonard et al, 1995a vice versa. This led to the identification of a total of 121 differentially expressed genes with a median FDR of 27.9%, that is, 33.8 false-positive genes on average.…”
Section: Identification Of Differentially Expressed Genes In MCC Versmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…be made. Originally, the grouping of Classic and Variant phenotypes for MCCs was cell line based (Leonard et al, 1993;Leonard et al, 1995aLeonard et al, , 2002Leonard and Bell, 1997). However, we have observed concordant results between tumor samples and their respective cell lines in several genomic deletion analyses (Leonard and Hayard, 1997;Leonard et al, 2000;Van Gele et al, 2000;Cook et al, 2001) and in immunohistochemical studies.…”
Section: Validation Of Array Gene-expression Levels and Classificatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations