2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2005.07.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of dopants distribution using electron holography and FIB-based lift-off preparation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was shown by Pozzi et al [61], and brought to application by Rau et al [62]. To make holography a comprehensive and fully quantitative method, problems of sample preparation and interpretation are under investigation [63][64][65][66][67][68]. Furthermore, in situ experiments applying voltages and tomography for a full 3D-analysis are under development [69].…”
Section: Figure 34mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was shown by Pozzi et al [61], and brought to application by Rau et al [62]. To make holography a comprehensive and fully quantitative method, problems of sample preparation and interpretation are under investigation [63][64][65][66][67][68]. Furthermore, in situ experiments applying voltages and tomography for a full 3D-analysis are under development [69].…”
Section: Figure 34mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case we chose a field of view (FOV) between 250 and 300 nm. Other FOVs can be chosen just as easily and reproducible for the characterization of materials in nanotechnology for extracting quantitative information such as electrostatic fields (Ortolani et al, 2011; Zhang et al, 1992; McCartney et al, 1997, 2010), magnetic fields (Hirayama et al, 1995; Osakabe et al, 1983), non-stained biological samples (Simon et al, 2004, 2008), and impurities in solids, determination of the thickness and the lattice distortion in nanostructured materials and dopant profiles and strain measurement in semiconductor technology (Cooper et al, 2011; Muehle et al, 2005; Hytch et al, 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,11,13,14 Practical methods that have been used previously for reducing surface damage include ex situ deposition of a thin metallic coating 16 and in situ electron-beam Pt deposition. 17 While ex situ coating with Au, Pt or some other heavy metal help to protect sample surfaces from ion-beam damage during ion milling, this approach is not suitable for samples where a site-specific feature may be covered, or where coating of the entire surface is not desirable, as will be the case when in situ biasing measurements are to be performed. In situ, site-specific coating seems to be the only viable approach in these situations.…”
Section: Assessment Of Surface Damage and Sidewall Implantation In Almentioning
confidence: 99%