1985
DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(85)90077-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of carotid artery disease: comparison of duplex scanning with histology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
13
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from studies, including recent ones, comparing sonographic plaque evaluation with histologic findings in endarterectomy specimens are inconsistent, with some authors reporting high correlation between histopathologic results and sonomorphologic appearance and others finding poor or no correlation (Ratiff et al 1985;Droste et al 1997;Biasi et al 1999;Schulte-Altedorneburg et al 2000;Gonçalves et al 2004). Data from studies, including recent ones, comparing sonographic plaque evaluation with histologic findings in endarterectomy specimens are inconsistent, with some authors reporting high correlation between histopathologic results and sonomorphologic appearance and others finding poor or no correlation (Ratiff et al 1985;Droste et al 1997;Biasi et al 1999;Schulte-Altedorneburg et al 2000;Gonçalves et al 2004).…”
Section: Diagnostic Role Of Duplex Ultrasound In Evaluating the Extramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from studies, including recent ones, comparing sonographic plaque evaluation with histologic findings in endarterectomy specimens are inconsistent, with some authors reporting high correlation between histopathologic results and sonomorphologic appearance and others finding poor or no correlation (Ratiff et al 1985;Droste et al 1997;Biasi et al 1999;Schulte-Altedorneburg et al 2000;Gonçalves et al 2004). Data from studies, including recent ones, comparing sonographic plaque evaluation with histologic findings in endarterectomy specimens are inconsistent, with some authors reporting high correlation between histopathologic results and sonomorphologic appearance and others finding poor or no correlation (Ratiff et al 1985;Droste et al 1997;Biasi et al 1999;Schulte-Altedorneburg et al 2000;Gonçalves et al 2004).…”
Section: Diagnostic Role Of Duplex Ultrasound In Evaluating the Extramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,26 Although recent advances in ultrasonographic evaluation of plaques are promising, different ultrasound scan studies have varied widely in both sensitivity and specificity for determining surface ulceration. 13,18,19,27,28 The same applies to the detection of intra-plaque hemorrhage. Moreover, in up to 37% of cases, it is not possible to evaluate the plaque surface due to acoustic shadowing or a high degree of stenosis.…”
Section: Conventional Imaging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Originally, the appearance of a plaque was either classified as echogenic (calcified) or echolucent (non-calcified). 18,19 Later, in an attempt to decrease observer variability, more detailed classifications were developed, such as the ones proposed by Gray-Weale and Geroulakos. 20,21 In these studies, grading of plaque morphology was largely based on the ultrasound scan gray scale appearance, which was assessed subjectively by visual inspection of ultrasound scan images.…”
Section: Conventional Imaging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following somewhat disappointing early results (RATIFF et al 1985;WOLVERSON et al 1983), the cor-relation between US data and histopathological findings is today considered satisfactory (LEYS 1996). Various studies have compared plaque surface characteristics on sonograms with examination of surgical specimens or angiographic findings.…”
Section: Sonoanatomic Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%